Archive

Re: [Lime] Eric Rescorla's No Record on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-06: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 22 February 2018 18:18 UTC

To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, lime-chairs@ietf.org, lime@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model@ietf.org
References: <151931292859.8172.17676467685442090922.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0bf546d6-0e8f-cc58-1cb4-03ad134e0601@cisco.com> <CABcZeBMr27bMXi8-wJznroz3ExHbv=Jhbnp-mL6_KuwFghA=UA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <467717d8-177d-1689-4a65-cfd6a11b6cb7@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:18:19 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMr27bMXi8-wJznroz3ExHbv=Jhbnp-mL6_KuwFghA=UA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------21B37430820FCD709679D50B"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/3EO1UCz6615Wf9QfaNLIczCeU-I>
Subject: Re: [Lime] Eric Rescorla's No Record on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-06: (with COMMENT)
Precedence: list

On 2/22/2018 10:43 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 7:29 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com 
> <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 2/22/2018 10:22 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>         Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
>         draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-06: No Record
>
>         When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply
>         to all
>         email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to
>         cut this
>         introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>         Please refer to
>         https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>         <https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html>
>         for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
>         The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found
>         here:
>         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model/
>         <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model/>
>
>
>
>         ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>         COMMENT:
>         ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>         I didn't really get through this, but I had a few editorial
>         points.
>
>         It's almost certainly my unfamiliarity with the setting, but I
>         found it
>         a bit hard to understand the context of this document. I think
>         there
>         were two things I found a bit confusing:
>
>         1. Why you need a separate model for connectionless and
>         connection-oriented
>             OAM?
>
>     The WG tried to a single model for both connectionless and
>     connection-oriented (the charter didn't make the distinction), but
>     that proved difficult. Therefore, It was decided to go with two
>     different models.
>     Maybe we could have added this piece of history in the write-up.
>
>
> It would have helped me a bit to have a sentence for why. Perhaps 
> something like
> "A companion document [REF] provides a model for connectionless 
> protocols. In the judgement of the
> working group, these settings were sufficiently different to justify 
> distinct models"
That's an easy fix.

Regards, B.
>
> -Ekr
>
>     Regards, Benoit
>
>
>         2. What sort of concepts should I be having in my head for MD,
>             MA, and MEP? Are these kind of like "site", "link", and
>         "endpoint"?
>
>         This may all be completely clear to people with OAM experience in
>         these settings, in which case feel free to ignore me. But it did
>         make it a bit hard for this layperson to read.
>
>
>         .
>
>
>

[Lime] Eric Rescorla's No Record on draft-ietf-... Eric Rescorla
Re: [Lime] Eric Rescorla's No Record on draft-i... Benoit Claise
Re: [Lime] Eric Rescorla's No Record on draft-i... Eric Rescorla
Re: [Lime] Eric Rescorla's No Record on draft-i... Benoit Claise