[Lime] Closure of the LIME WG

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 26 February 2018 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531261270AE for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:22:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id haUTbIccjG75 for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:22:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB8FB12D87A for <lime@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:22:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=640; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1519680147; x=1520889747; h=from:subject:to:message-id:date:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=/Knnvrwyn9lcPEOSgAR21DxjNWfwCRcKrILrXjxKPRQ=; b=dhKq5QPw4AvRGtYLkkFzhuHrksiqgnJDRNAhc+MdDItUr3s0wlTE7NxX 1UUqES84rQ/KdC8hAJy859LRxthEZ4iaJZTugy3WE7ltYn3flX4tuOvSe kV98ZWkg4lvRI5kxLb8BT7OH7GsNGF4Y8LdaQEDXmHIIVOuUJgGCa0mZq I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CJAQBheZRa/xbLJq1eGQEBAQECAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEIAQEBAYUmg3yLFo5aC4E9lhmCAgqIUhQBAgEBAQEBAQJrHQuFTRU2QAImAl8?= =?us-ascii?q?NCAEBhQycKpAZgieEdIN8ghQBAQgCJoEPiAqBZikMh2GDRYJlBaFhCYF+kiKBc?= =?us-ascii?q?ok5hzWOUYckgS81IYFRMxoIGxU6gkSEWj+NDQEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,398,1515456000"; d="scan'208";a="2256752"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Feb 2018 21:22:25 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w1QLMPP9007711 for <lime@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:22:25 GMT
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <15e6717a-cb2e-0455-9696-1a2ebb1d9e91@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 22:22:25 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/5Ox9xRh17AmDdg48r0ecp4pBu-I>
Subject: [Lime] Closure of the LIME WG
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:22:32 -0000

Dear all,

The IESG just approved the last LIME document, our last LIME 
deliverable. Therefore, it now sits in the RFC-editor, along with the 
other LIME specifications.

Our mission is now finished, it's now time to close the WG.
While this is a success already, the next success will happen when the 
LIME YANG modules will be augmented for existing and new OAM mechanisms.

Let me thank the co-chairs Carlos and Ron for their guidance, the 
document editors and authors, the reviewers and the entire working group 
for their feedback and perseverance.

The mailing list will remain open for some time.

Regards, Benoit