Re: [Lime] Progress on LIME Connectionless documents

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Fri, 22 September 2017 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7DC132199 for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 12:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YMRzhEqvJbqc for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 12:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com (mail-lf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 238A1124207 for <lime@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 12:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id a18so1997225lfl.13 for <lime@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 12:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8tz/SwMibC4EjpUyYazdn2Dald9QKqYDOBD8nihGefQ=; b=pW5qEodDOBd3vWC1tuLUkhmAO/I1FTkWmymYRGaZUvOy8ztTwgDKJS4o3w38zLTi/Z HrrexUzKJ3dU+njy+6qVL6SzLC2v05KLqgP6xNl6mOq5MslZniiR/6mj9QZOT9P5NA03 H9nyIN5W7LT1+2TjF2Vdv0wkFxzpOFGG+dXX4qT0waLPj2w9pAztTCGZs+rf8iD7LbcL bllmSWass72zj1y6wT0ty4G55hsYYuLNCzVPb1IgWXxvigDjPKVEJ3kiQ9A5RJvvcZqh HI4wOfNcidVKMDYoRgmapxXPr9GKf3d5uYcoowzD0u3UfqanFq0QGdtNyDKxUUeOlJQP G59Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8tz/SwMibC4EjpUyYazdn2Dald9QKqYDOBD8nihGefQ=; b=N+Gi1X6gVIAhP0LeET8+udW3ONsU1W0ddNroXe8A42VnEy4vxUf5R7si5GHm27v7Xm JmmdOpTaozVrKa5NwcjRx7bGTT0G8epvtAFdB4GNkHCfL1rlcCb1OPoTtzqWGucVXJiO dt+jORRxE5/X01rBjQghesBMd1SrITeRDM8/yfkNLoyRNGbG0wFXzfZiytxnNGB/bmRH TMVezD6eL8THyBiueydtieo29qKYbQs4XSq4LI5CcSEox+hbJH2sGHjhhzX7AG3UcEta dx0ftZqGSlSvzODAsQYvtNSvKMvMWsgRZqOaJbR2htL9jEKDgiM1oU3KnQgoFkiNzFj0 TY1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjubQMz9THilsGPluWPnibslqld+7KPBe00pl/vs0BGeo5QETkJ Y7EgdWieIpn627RBKAaeo98zo9CbNYTORBmaNRs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBdidzemXBcoRbaGkIyNw/09SstjS3H+hyWnRx4nX/JSRJpX5XMwrwMMSsTB4mjsEoka9Vv+OOeMzQJNxXl+g4=
X-Received: by 10.25.18.38 with SMTP id h38mr49847lfi.73.1506107370064; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 12:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.32.201 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 12:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmWbGm9VVt3q5EjZ+k8VweNK6dDeAUkqhhVDhtQZrR-kkw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <29E5AA02-4CC5-4CA9-A967-A9355EBD9175@cisco.com> <CA+RyBmWbGm9VVt3q5EjZ+k8VweNK6dDeAUkqhhVDhtQZrR-kkw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 12:09:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmW_W1uQeCEeAKPGBN7gfceffNBvSCgfrUD8gPhx9Oeodw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Cc: "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113fb374c94eab0559cbf2b0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/BHO5oR-qYkTu3XeWpU9Vdsg9Ck0>
Subject: Re: [Lime] Progress on LIME Connectionless documents
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 19:09:35 -0000

Dear All,
I haven't heard from authors of the CL OAM Methods draft response to these
comments.

Regards,
Greg

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Dear All,
> below please find my comments to the current version
> of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods draft:
>
>    - Abstract
>       - "... interactive OAM workflows ( i.e., performing OAM functions
>       at same levels through a unified interface)." I think that "interactive"
>       does not accurately characterizes the relationship between domains on the
>       same network layer. "Interworking" would be more accurate or, at the
>       minimum, "interacting".
>    -
>
>    OAM Retrieval Methods Hierarchy
>
>    - as noted in comments to draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam,
>       need use case for Test Point of mac-address type;
>       - src-dst-address is not part of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam
>       tp-address grouping. Stale hierarchy?
>       - fec-type is not listed in tp-address grouping either. Another
>       stale element?
>       - tlv-address - same story, stale.
>    -
>
>    OAM Retrieval Methods YANG Module
>
>    - leaf count (number of packets that will be sent) has type uint32 and
>       thus cannot support "forever" mode. I believe support of "forever" mode is
>       important and should be provided;
>
> Summarizing, in my opinion the current version of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods
> is not ready for publication.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <
> cpignata@cisco.com>; wrote:
>
>> Dear WG,
>>
>> We will be progressing the LIME Connectionless documents, submitting them
>> to our AD.
>>
>> Please see the respective write-ups at:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connec
>> tionless-oam/shepherdwriteup/
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connec
>> tionless-oam-methods/shepherdwriteup/
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Carlos & Ron.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lime mailing list
>> Lime@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime
>>
>>
>