Re: [Lime] Progress on LIME Connectionless documents

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Wed, 28 June 2017 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAFF129B62 for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iVvivj6Sm2um for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58BC1128C81 for <lime@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10480; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1498687376; x=1499896976; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=OfbqPeLU8dLhivR9lHJQ2+clTHz39W2VtOH93rbpvT0=; b=V02CGfv94S/GrLojLbSKJfCNS1CAdFywK4mNqC42md0nhNDCi+sp085W rdyJj30bNahH2SyOdsCOWoiNTpll0FFi7Xz3VYUzLLr92pbCvX4dLVhBK 07xIk1gWbUanEn65jlA7hCqJQWhPlI48HtUN1bv/vvXZ10kyqMPHfWv53 A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DNAABRJlRZ/5NdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1hjgQ4Hg2WKGZoRiCWFK4IRIQEMhW4CGoJvPxgBAgEBAQEBAQF?= =?us-ascii?q?rKIUZAgEDAQEhSwsQAgEIPwMCAgIfBgsUEQIEDgWJTEwDFRADsgeCJocuDYQPA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWDJ4NMgWErgnmCV4UmMIISHwWJRpRzOwK?= =?us-ascii?q?HN4dQhGcLgX+FSopCiS0hghyJPQEfOIEKdBVJEgGERYI7dog0gQ0BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,277,1496102400"; d="scan'208,217";a="263626807"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jun 2017 22:02:55 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-006.cisco.com (xch-rtp-006.cisco.com [64.101.220.146]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v5SM2tVq010751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 22:02:55 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-006.cisco.com (64.101.220.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:02:54 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:02:54 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
CC: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lime] Progress on LIME Connectionless documents
Thread-Index: AQHS8Ez8tVaJ4V6SAEWApwuYmmJ6UaI7AeMAgAAU1QA=
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 22:02:54 +0000
Message-ID: <EE1E0223-21A1-471B-89D4-B3A00A10C567@cisco.com>
References: <29E5AA02-4CC5-4CA9-A967-A9355EBD9175@cisco.com> <CA+RyBmXRaE3-nRbvzOAUqio7LFbzav6z5WDwLs07MOnFXiPMOg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmXRaE3-nRbvzOAUqio7LFbzav6z5WDwLs07MOnFXiPMOg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.116.131]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_EE1E022321A1471B89D4B3A00A10C567ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/C0jK4TZl1O7QM9mSF08CpNe0lSk>
Subject: Re: [Lime] Progress on LIME Connectionless documents
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 22:02:58 -0000

Greg,

I am astonished at your statement.

WGLCs:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/hcOi85Eu3dquUJZwWvx3BW_ZGbE
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/4fRb9w-S9Z01x3CCRty7x8uhdmw

Your comments to the WGLCs:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/Bx6A0eqPRT4qXU8e_caXm4EElQA
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/8_O41P0U4yy2zNfeX4jwxSZk6oU

After that the authors worked with you to incorporate your comments. Subsequent revisions prompted more comments from you, all of which were appropriately disposed of:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/x_ljuI0fvvNn2TSwj1BqXO6vgVo
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/nQGL4cgWSaCWpNXiLnvgt_OqbSk

After that, the chairs gave you additional time and provided specific review to subsequent comments:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/oY44xRj9wm6aiqALdyRLuQ3j1BQ

A disposition to a comment means that they could have resulted in a change, or not.

IPR call coincinging with Adoption call:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/1ojMMWgjloC3FsE3Hp9E2JN2u00

I hope that clarifies?

Thanks,

— Carlos.

On Jun 28, 2017, at 4:47 PM, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com<mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Carlos and Ron,
thank you for the update on these drafts. I haven't seen IPR poll, WGLC on any of these. Have I missed them? I do have comments I'd like to share. Or should I wait for the IETF LC?

Regards, Greg

On Jun 28, 2017 1:27 PM, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com<mailto:cpignata@cisco.com>> wrote:
Dear WG,

We will be progressing the LIME Connectionless documents, submitting them to our AD.

Please see the respective write-ups at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam/shepherdwriteup/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods/shepherdwriteup/

Thanks,

Carlos & Ron.

_______________________________________________
Lime mailing list
Lime@ietf.org<mailto:Lime@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime