Re: [Lime] Progress on LIME Connectionless documents

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <> Wed, 28 June 2017 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAFF129B62 for <>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iVvivj6Sm2um for <>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58BC1128C81 for <>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=10480; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1498687376; x=1499896976; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=OfbqPeLU8dLhivR9lHJQ2+clTHz39W2VtOH93rbpvT0=; b=V02CGfv94S/GrLojLbSKJfCNS1CAdFywK4mNqC42md0nhNDCi+sp085W rdyJj30bNahH2SyOdsCOWoiNTpll0FFi7Xz3VYUzLLr92pbCvX4dLVhBK 07xIk1gWbUanEn65jlA7hCqJQWhPlI48HtUN1bv/vvXZ10kyqMPHfWv53 A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,277,1496102400"; d="scan'208,217";a="263626807"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jun 2017 22:02:55 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v5SM2tVq010751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 22:02:55 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:02:54 -0400
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:02:54 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <>
To: Greg Mirsky <>
CC: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [Lime] Progress on LIME Connectionless documents
Thread-Index: AQHS8Ez8tVaJ4V6SAEWApwuYmmJ6UaI7AeMAgAAU1QA=
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 22:02:54 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_EE1E022321A1471B89D4B3A00A10C567ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Lime] Progress on LIME Connectionless documents
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 22:02:58 -0000


I am astonished at your statement.


Your comments to the WGLCs:

After that the authors worked with you to incorporate your comments. Subsequent revisions prompted more comments from you, all of which were appropriately disposed of:

After that, the chairs gave you additional time and provided specific review to subsequent comments:

A disposition to a comment means that they could have resulted in a change, or not.

IPR call coincinging with Adoption call:

I hope that clarifies?


— Carlos.

On Jun 28, 2017, at 4:47 PM, Greg Mirsky <<>> wrote:

Hi Carlos and Ron,
thank you for the update on these drafts. I haven't seen IPR poll, WGLC on any of these. Have I missed them? I do have comments I'd like to share. Or should I wait for the IETF LC?

Regards, Greg

On Jun 28, 2017 1:27 PM, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <<>> wrote:
Dear WG,

We will be progressing the LIME Connectionless documents, submitting them to our AD.

Please see the respective write-ups at:


Carlos & Ron.

Lime mailing list<>