Re: [Lime] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-11: (with COMMENT)

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Thu, 26 October 2017 07:04 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC7C13A2B8; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6-6lDh0SJ_0j; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 487DB13A441; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO LHREML713-CAH.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DRI66647; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:03:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by LHREML713-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 08:03:48 +0100
Received: from NKGEML513-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.105]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:03:44 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
CC: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "cpignata@cisco.com" <cpignata@cisco.com>, "lime-chairs@ietf.org" <lime-chairs@ietf.org>, "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods@ietf.org>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-11: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTTaPKHDvtwY9U9UKmuTg79eJoAqL1TBeQ//+FhQCAAOQxgA==
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:03:43 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AC17901@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <150894439333.4826.10990964653413411779.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AC172AC@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com> <1C5DFCB3-471F-4EA9-9CBE-FEC4DB4F4555@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <1C5DFCB3-471F-4EA9-9CBE-FEC4DB4F4555@cooperw.in>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.79.163]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.59F188D5.0002, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.1.105, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: bb6430db6a8d6a96965b96ac7bfd5b89
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/Edb8r5oSwi3NQVPbcvRWAhm5o9Q>
Subject: Re: [Lime] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 07:04:08 -0000

Thanks.
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa@cooperw.in] 
发送时间: 2017年10月26日 9:27
收件人: Qin Wu
抄送: IESG; cpignata@cisco.com; lime-chairs@ietf.org; lime@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods@ietf.org; Ron Bonica
主题: Re: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-11: (with COMMENT)

Got it, sorry for missing this earlier.
Alissa

> On Oct 25, 2017, at 8:49 PM, Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Alissa, this issue raised by Brian has been addressed in dependent document v-12 of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam.
> See changes related to grouping session-jitter-statistics and grouping session-delay-statistics:
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionles
> s-oam-12.txt Brian has confirmed this issue got addressed in Gen-art 
> ML.
> 
> -Qin
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Alissa Cooper [mailto:alissa@cooperw.in]
> 发送时间: 2017年10月25日 23:13
> 收件人: The IESG
> 抄送: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods@ietf.org; Carlos 
> Pignataro; Ron Bonica; lime-chairs@ietf.org; cpignata@cisco.com; 
> lime@ietf.org
> 主题: Alissa Cooper's No Objection on 
> draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-11: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-11: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all 
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut 
> this introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to 
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-o
> am-methods/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> There is an outstanding issue stemming from the Gen-ART review concerning whether two-way delay is supported and whether it would be signaled by specifying TWAMP as the protocol-id. This should be resolved before the document gets published.
> 
>