[Lime] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-10
Carl Moberg <calle@tail-f.com> Fri, 02 June 2017 07:57 UTC
Return-Path: <calle@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE23C12ACAF; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 00:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Carl Moberg <calle@tail-f.com>
To: yang-doctors@ietf.org
Cc: lime@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.52.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149639025372.31882.14301747353948788147@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:57:33 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/OcRM4901kV8jrNQ53A0pa7cZ0Gs>
Subject: [Lime] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model-10
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 07:57:34 -0000
Reviewer: Carl Moberg Review result: On the Right Track I am the assigned YANG Doctor for the LIME YANG modules, this is the notes from my initial review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model done with the authors: First of all, would suggest we rename draft and the module itself: OLD: draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model NEW: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model OLD: ietf-conn-oam NEW: ietf-connection-oriented-oam There are several uses of 'ordered-by system;'. Unless there is a specific, and documented reason for pointing out this default behavior, I suggest we simply remove them entirely. Please review the use of case, e.g. the 'Interval' typedef should likely be all lowercase. The description fields will need some language editing before release, e.g. the "Indicate whether the CC enable." description string for the 'MEP' list.