Re: [Lime] draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-01 - IPR

"Deepak Kumar (dekumar)" <dekumar@cisco.com> Thu, 14 December 2017 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <dekumar@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF841126DCA for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:56:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yfggTwWZzjPv for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:56:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2A2E12421A for <lime@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:56:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7041; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1513216576; x=1514426176; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=A+i7FaJttBVXJB7/WOru7+G+HRNJ7W/naaFtu/UqKqU=; b=JKTRTPIR3TT/CKHvJgrj00zKzy4eXHCX0hchLlK6gAWRCiaPRtIB62rQ Z9s/pLrDm2ttg2OGD/Qzn9xQLE7Pj+ljhkyasKXtiT2fHJ4oP9iDwK8Z8 3qzAdHgttBNb+Z05zJbK7OFgtawqtsSIyRa64r1RQvRR5sLPyJbbvt0fu g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DNAADI2TFa/40NJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM+ZnQnhAKKIY8Hk0OFTRSCAQoYAQqFGAIahHk/GAEBAQEBAQEBAWsohSQCBAEBIUsLEAIBBgI/AwICAiULFBECBA4FiURkEIsQnWyCJ4phAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWDYIILgVaCEoMCgy4BgTsBEgGDNDGCMgWjHwKVJYIWhhKLQJY5AhEZAYE6AR85YG5vFToqAYF+hFZ4h1iCOQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.45,399,1508803200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="44483559"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 14 Dec 2017 01:56:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vBE1uF22011559 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 01:56:15 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:56:15 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com ([173.37.102.14]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:56:14 -0600
From: "Deepak Kumar (dekumar)" <dekumar@cisco.com>
To: wangzitao <wangzitao@huawei.com>
CC: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lime] draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-01 - IPR
Thread-Index: AQHTdH65eGD+54IJSUe1qhIV/KU4og==
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 01:56:14 +0000
Message-ID: <6BFADC2E-D3E3-4FB4-89C1-63E442778345@cisco.com>
References: <E6BC9BBCBCACC246846FC685F9FF41EA2B8A617B@DGGEML504-MBS.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <E6BC9BBCBCACC246846FC685F9FF41EA2B8A617B@DGGEML504-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6BFADC2ED3E34FB489C163E442778345ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/RjW4jWOZdDEelul_6SlgQjoSWJQ>
Subject: Re: [Lime] draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-01 - IPR
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 01:56:19 -0000

+1, I have no ipr related to this document.

Thanks
Deepak

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 13, 2017, at 4:55 PM, wangzitao <wangzitao@huawei.com<mailto:wangzitao@huawei.com>> wrote:

+1, I have no IPR related to it.

Best Regards!
-Michael

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Lime [mailto:lime-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Qin Wu
发送时间: 2017年12月14日 8:50
收件人: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net<mailto:rbonica@juniper.net>>; lime@ietf.org<mailto:lime@ietf.org>
主题: Re: [Lime] draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-01 - IPR

I have no IPR related to this document.

-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Lime [mailto:lime-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Ron Bonica
发送时间: 2017年12月13日 23:19
收件人: lime@ietf.org<mailto:lime@ietf.org>
主题: [Lime] draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-01 - IPR

Deepak, Qin, Michael, Tissa, Norm, Samer,

Could each of you please respond to this email stating whether you have any knowledge of IPR against draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-01?

A response from each of you is required to progress this document.

                                                     Ron

_______________________________________________
Lime mailing list
Lime@ietf.org<mailto:Lime@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime
_______________________________________________
Lime mailing list
Lime@ietf.org<mailto:Lime@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime
_______________________________________________
Lime mailing list
Lime@ietf.org<mailto:Lime@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime