Re: [Lime] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-01.txt

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 28 February 2017 07:48 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DE8129460 for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:48:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gEOEOSDTafKn for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:48:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AABC1289B0 for <lime@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:48:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8695; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1488268116; x=1489477716; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=jWWGTlEJMi70Sc9dpkFTKDTlzNAuD6vsBdqjuLyinLs=; b=fkbZFMb/l9gb95WYZVaAFVToarZFImsVK9AxlTePZ5PBnrm0TtGYEPj7 pIQtbPrmeKUoDWJrkFQ9CApH5UVVs1ePg7Xfm1nyVRFAKiReU17kyuJJF eHzU9FYNPCG+1KfFmy/mVu+f+PKdD7mSnbg2TZBUgJUEC+8R/yd3ymI31 8=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,218,1484006400"; d="scan'208,217";a="652863615"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Feb 2017 07:48:34 +0000
Received: from [10.61.101.37] (dhcp-10-61-101-37.cisco.com [10.61.101.37]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1S7mWVL002561; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 07:48:33 GMT
To: wangzitao <wangzitao@huawei.com>, "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>
References: <148791874751.21112.11151757029740620338.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E6BC9BBCBCACC246846FC685F9FF41EA2AD823C3@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <8ce8d10b-a742-be9d-48c8-e9a785a38004@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:48:31 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E6BC9BBCBCACC246846FC685F9FF41EA2AD823C3@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------80FD13D3E9D1D9139BB7DE31"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/T63NUi2xpQpZVEg-wpHcYnG9mYA>
Cc: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>, "Srihari Raghavan (srihari)" <srihari@cisco.com>, "rkrejci@cesnet.cz" <rkrejci@cesnet.cz>, Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "Deepak Kumar (dekumar)" <dekumar@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Lime] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-01.txt
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 07:48:37 -0000

Michael,

See the warnings at http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html
Note: don't worry about this one

    warn: Not supported "mount-point" extension statement found, ignoring.

Regards, Benoit
> Dear WG,
>
> We update the Connectionless OAM Retrieval Method YANG document to address some issues raised in WGLC discussions.
> In this new version, we fix some nits and rewrite some sentences to make it more articulately. And we also add some new RPCs such as
> 'cc-persistent-create', 'cc-persistent-modify', 'cc-persistent-delete', 'pd-persistent-create', 'pd-persistent-modify',
> and 'pd-persistent-delete', which allow user to trigger persistent CC/Path-discovery OAM while specifying the options for data-export from device.
> More details please see the draft. Comments and suggestions are welcome!
>
> Best Regards!
> -Michael
>
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Lime [mailto:lime-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 internet-drafts@ietf.org
> 发送时间: 2017年2月24日 14:46
> 收件人: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> 抄送: lime@ietf.org
> 主题: [Lime] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-01.txt
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Layer Independent OAM Management in the Multi-Layer Environment of the IETF.
>
>          Title           : Retrieval Methods YANG Data Model for Connectionless Operations, Administration, and Maintenance(OAM) protocols
>          Authors         : Deepak Kumar
>                            Michael Wang
>                            Qin Wu
>                            Reshad Rahman
>                            Srihari Raghavan
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-01.txt
> 	Pages           : 37
> 	Date            : 2017-02-23
>
> Abstract:
>     This document presents a retrieval method YANG Data model for
>     connectionless OAM protocols.  It provides a technology-independent
>     RPC commands for connectionless OAM protocols.  The retrieval methods
>     model presented here can be extended to include technology specific
>     details.  This is leading to uniformity between OAM protocols and
>     support both nested OAM workflows (i.e., performing OAM functions at
>     different levels through a unified interface) and interactive OAM
>     workflows ( i.e., performing OAM functions at same levels through a
>     unified interface).
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-01
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-01
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lime mailing list
> Lime@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime
> _______________________________________________
> Lime mailing list
> Lime@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime