IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lime] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: (with COMMENT)

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Thu, 22 February 2018 03:20 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35AC126D85; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:20:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qlc8ifRZamL1; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:20:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 453BB1241FC; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:20:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 6C202B4E81079; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 03:20:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 03:20:18 +0000
Received: from NKGEML513-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.231]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 11:20:14 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model@ietf.org>, "rbonica@juniper.net" <rbonica@juniper.net>, "lime-chairs@ietf.org" <lime-chairs@ietf.org>, "rbonica@juniper.net" <rbonica@juniper.net>, "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTqdQ075k8JUcMMkmJ7IvTtruCkaOvxCTA
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 03:20:13 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AD64320@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <151908069230.29581.4264640042730170093.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151908069230.29581.4264640042730170093.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.79.67]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/VbBfo_nNkwLQ7yzArZdLyVKNPD0>
Subject: Re: [Lime] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 03:20:23 -0000

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Mirja Kühlewind [mailto:ietf@kuehlewind.net] 
发送时间: 2018年2月20日 6:52
收件人: The IESG
抄送: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model@ietf.org; rbonica@juniper.net; lime-chairs@ietf.org; rbonica@juniper.net; lime@ietf.org
主题: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

One question:
Does this YANG model somehow relate to the lmap YANG model (RFC8194)? I mean at least one could probably also use lmap to configure a traceroute in some intervals…

[Qin]: Agree with Benoit, See Benoit's reply in the separate email.
One editorial comment:
sec 1: This sentence is superfluous as inherently true: „All implementations that follow the YANG framework presented in this
   document MUST implement the generic connection oriented YANG model
   presented here.“

[Qin]: Agree to remove this superfluous statement.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email