Re: [Lime] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: (with COMMENT)
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Thu, 22 February 2018 04:05 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E0C129C6E; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:05:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QnqKILIT36M8; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:05:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEB98128C0A; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 20:05:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LHREML712-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E12E3332E86B; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 04:05:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.70) by LHREML712-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 04:05:43 +0000
Received: from NKGEML513-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.231]) by nkgeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:05:35 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "rbonica@juniper.net" <rbonica@juniper.net>, "lime-chairs@ietf.org" <lime-chairs@ietf.org>, "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lime] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTq1VB+7W26O2c6UihncS+Bims4aOvzdDQ
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 04:05:34 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AD64624@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <151924606654.22818.10997579736537198184.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <151924606654.22818.10997579736537198184.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.79.67]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/_O2-ckkscs3j6zFPq_h12AZdmuM>
Subject: Re: [Lime] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 04:05:47 -0000
I have moved IEEE802.1ag to normative, note that there is no other RFCs reference IEEE802.1ag. -Qin -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Lime [mailto:lime-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Alvaro Retana 发送时间: 2018年2月22日 4:48 收件人: The IESG 抄送: rbonica@juniper.net; lime-chairs@ietf.org; lime@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model@ietf.org 主题: [Lime] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: (with COMMENT) Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- It seems to me that the reference to IEEE802.1ag should be Normative. " In this document, we take the CFM [IEEE802.1ag] model and extend it to a technology independent framework and define the corresponding YANG model accordingly." _______________________________________________ Lime mailing list Lime@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime