Re: [Lime] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: (with COMMENT)

David Ball <daviball@cisco.com> Thu, 22 February 2018 10:37 UTC

Return-Path: <daviball@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A65612E8E6; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 02:37:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HMbDJ-HcwZzv; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 02:37:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FC5512E87B; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 02:37:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2143; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1519295877; x=1520505477; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XrlIUIEhlk827VNOqnipNUjsVaK2+Tu+6WthDyy4uiI=; b=kmps/4X94esFPG7JDwHpdOyBsHTr/QattC4op/gJTd6+Grt91R1yyI5K JSMFYeEZSaE6v3Bsm4SMrxxNXU8kgLgOFcowpHOtxlh2DEJsJ3ziLV+pO 5wNSRXPtg/E1xWY7qFiIbXqTbkBaLZII0Mv0LCFSiG2sbUAACoA93hxnU I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0B1AQDYnI5a/xbLJq1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYQ1cCiDaIsZjlQygRaWThSCAgoYDYUPAoJ/FgECAQEBAQEBAms?= =?us-ascii?q?ohSQBAQQBASEPAQU2CxAJAg4KAgIfBAMCAicfEQYBDAYCAQGKHxCNBJ10gieFA?= =?us-ascii?q?IN3ghMBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYEPhAKDfoFnKYMFgzABAQECAYE?= =?us-ascii?q?6ARIBgzaCZQWKcplNCYgojWaCIIYog3GIC44MggGIHYE8JgYsYFgRCDMaCBsVO?= =?us-ascii?q?oJDgwmBbUE3AYoFgj4BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,377,1515456000"; d="scan'208";a="2171395"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Feb 2018 10:37:54 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.91] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-91.cisco.com [10.63.23.91]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w1MAbrNN014207; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:37:54 GMT
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: "rbonica@juniper.net" <rbonica@juniper.net>, "lime-chairs@ietf.org" <lime-chairs@ietf.org>, "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model@ietf.org>
References: <151924606654.22818.10997579736537198184.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AD64624@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
From: David Ball <daviball@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <92c3e9a9-4fe7-e370-f0e9-b09a622addf0@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:37:53 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AD64624@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/ds9Fz5Qz4_EsagyLi0_7x_Azy0M>
Subject: Re: [Lime] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:37:59 -0000

IEEE 802.1ag (an amendment to 802.1Q-2005) was subsumed into (and 
superseded by) IEEE 802.1Q-2011.  You should refer to the latest version 
of 802.1Q (which I believe is 802.1Q-2014).


     David


On 22/02/2018 04:05, Qin Wu wrote:
> I have moved IEEE802.1ag to normative, note that there is no other RFCs reference IEEE802.1ag.
>
> -Qin
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Lime [mailto:lime-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Alvaro Retana
> 发送时间: 2018年2月22日 4:48
> 收件人: The IESG
> 抄送: rbonica@juniper.net; lime-chairs@ietf.org; lime@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model@ietf.org
> 主题: [Lime] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: (with COMMENT)
>
> Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> It seems to me that the reference to IEEE802.1ag should be Normative.
>
> "  In this document, we take the CFM [IEEE802.1ag] model and
>     extend it to a technology independent framework and define the
>     corresponding YANG model accordingly."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lime mailing list
> Lime@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime
> _______________________________________________
> Lime mailing list
> Lime@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime

-- 
David Ball
<daviball@cisco.com>;