Re: [Lime] Progress on LIME Connectionless documents

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Thu, 20 July 2017 12:31 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4217131794 for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I8kaXok_zSrM for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x235.google.com (mail-qt0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EC85129B43 for <lime@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 21so20946563qtx.3 for <lime@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9vVJIQXbd0kHdWw1Han7dA7G6alWKeFw++0RN2h30Ak=; b=ahk73STLh7ffjpzH7hnJX9IrBSZENCvie07OmBFoXWKgUQodTpQYHts52NcEwHuE8d U1y4wXNFLOPqhgYfX8Z1yho+PZ9lZjsjNB7RGH95ODpaZhJ7zcsUb7lnBkZ20HXdd7wD BDYedn2u2zL9b3jHMIqmb+MhSXO7mSuPDqyeytrCqIq4LKAahRDbi2jyf1lpO1SQeTYT AtcPgZeiIHAmpRkrTMt8SOhlQBaD+w7nrdKSaT/Io+ZzKt7xKh1TAn3alSXGYzNtz6b9 3vurMqbYgtETFzrXGM6ITZtNoydDjAexwQAtsj9XwGpu48GgyBzOEGDWalJ+1kRvC2s6 DB7w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9vVJIQXbd0kHdWw1Han7dA7G6alWKeFw++0RN2h30Ak=; b=I6GdKpVkQ0cRtzZERnBJMhLkI/rcKF5+HjjkpVBM/UogHYUfI/4lfClzKvBThONYbj RgVco+9+RCWMriHdTHW83++s2tCp34aXH7p2IBVu8KBX44ddHR962oUZCA9hakvDSpPJ RPav2xlSDzI7sLyw7jT7W5wMMOk90l+7qr+Jq5HQG5vdnVjF5W+6Mj2sRiEVHtKJDkQo W+452IXFIYY9l5b4gk5r9/btODKmV7SuZVZd9vddl3Cj5d62+IeZowYwEVjODCv78Vbn 3tZhYX55khcx8F/I/dc5gb1gB9wY+sVjtp+upshpGf9BKoWTsR+BfMUab1ZjVECLdeL/ 92lg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110f3Y57yBOwNVwMfqFMiKHFacHPQ0WbmjF7rNHmrHArSZ12HZZO IEVgUB40Pb5hWHqIGnajrGNZNGcPNw==
X-Received: by 10.55.155.81 with SMTP id d78mr4816373qke.272.1500553907359; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.22.227 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <29E5AA02-4CC5-4CA9-A967-A9355EBD9175@cisco.com>
References: <29E5AA02-4CC5-4CA9-A967-A9355EBD9175@cisco.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:31:46 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmWbGm9VVt3q5EjZ+k8VweNK6dDeAUkqhhVDhtQZrR-kkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Cc: "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0770289d55b50554beeed2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/l9Ym6lj7twTqqB0wz_EyHam_9P8>
Subject: Re: [Lime] Progress on LIME Connectionless documents
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:31:58 -0000

Dear All,
below please find my comments to the current version
of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods draft:

   - Abstract
      - "... interactive OAM workflows ( i.e., performing OAM functions at
      same levels through a unified interface)." I think that
"interactive" does
      not accurately characterizes the relationship between domains on the same
      network layer. "Interworking" would be more accurate or, at the minimum,
      "interacting".
   -

   OAM Retrieval Methods Hierarchy

   - as noted in comments to draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam, need
      use case for Test Point of mac-address type;
      - src-dst-address is not part of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam
      tp-address grouping. Stale hierarchy?
      - fec-type is not listed in tp-address grouping either. Another stale
      element?
      - tlv-address - same story, stale.
   -

   OAM Retrieval Methods YANG Module

   - leaf count (number of packets that will be sent) has type uint32 and
      thus cannot support "forever" mode. I believe support of
"forever" mode is
      important and should be provided;

Summarizing, in my opinion the current version of
draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods is not ready for
publication.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <
cpignata@cisco.com>; wrote:

> Dear WG,
>
> We will be progressing the LIME Connectionless documents, submitting them
> to our AD.
>
> Please see the respective write-ups at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam/
> shepherdwriteup/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-
> connectionless-oam-methods/shepherdwriteup/
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carlos & Ron.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lime mailing list
> Lime@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime
>
>