IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lime] draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-01 - IPR

tsenevir <tsenevir@gmail.com> Mon, 18 December 2017 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <tsenevir@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29271243F3 for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:08:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zP0lo2uVfoUm for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:08:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x235.google.com (mail-pg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E26EE1289B0 for <lime@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:08:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x235.google.com with SMTP id k15so9391341pgr.7 for <lime@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:08:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:date:subject:importance:from:to:mime-version; bh=Mxv909n5wGgPcwOhix8MxofhPfb+gOef4OtnXqX9Tvs=; b=IazOKLmL09ci4JTdwjq0exUsi+nmXf49WFDRD6ReZ32/5pduN7Mf4MvCHNhPNw/FLZ k992xKrHZzwBbqozsQfu2/TAe9L/qm2yel4tSwKfrE7F1JeBU+u1qU6HtgVl5kEpvYRp aCaQaa/i6kDvJI+XcVpVUwePN4ejhM7M6moEsnDWbq7Ru3mRzKtSIupa2DiHQZdMWOPz V68cmxnjHuyGZCBpkhLtBv/HQwz+MPghr3/Frvn+kIExgQlOoX3XKAHSdSF37QzwLvnK U2vcsnXOjo8Fuzo1+fSivA9xlTw120WrWXSJJfshLOEylyl/sxonm3fTeYsKYoTSiKaP AKpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:subject:importance:from:to :mime-version; bh=Mxv909n5wGgPcwOhix8MxofhPfb+gOef4OtnXqX9Tvs=; b=knPGg8iHWIIbRTitxQ6SGYgWDGAk8XCUN+ERRmJTfpgKY66dlgskC6bSRbrYUtf7T/ FFNu5exYQZNmkrSdPb6/uJpYKQ79wlhWxZqWuTqtKU+rqJbrKA7Adoaxa4uM9Iz3vSqn k3EQVuWtwpGvmSqVJll/eTYX1HWblCKWnRx852q708z5mw0oMNPOv0T8aNrbSDR9IhWs AeGz4U4olIKR3fP+g3f04vF3hO5Mm/eKYprMIhqR92dzLpsHXZ/4RzlLIr4mIifFRFf+ QOGswN8GBDkMDsSbHV39gemKA0/mUPZ6Ohyri4GLbBizbHUQ/Hsqa38izkgxcyZChUPh OnbQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLv0KArze2qLECKVrsWVW6Xj69Cb7XQzqxYy6Y95pgqKiSXgvtW OCN76gy00N1P1gGuVo7e+CE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosmwLaRsovyAMH3CD7VlUTVZYPI9KKa0rgnWLuLHStKYPaZXXAQa66sfTHOrBtohPfZ1U5YJw==
X-Received: by 10.99.178.77 with SMTP id t13mr327363pgo.77.1513616921249; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:08:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1010:b055:18ea:4d14:7e5:4b32:9af2? ([2600:1010:b055:18ea:4d14:7e5:4b32:9af2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g7sm1024531pfm.76.2017.12.18.09.08.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:08:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5a37f618.47f9620a.b9413.2527@mx.google.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:08:38 -0800
Importance: normal
From: tsenevir <tsenevir@gmail.com>
To: "Samer Salam (ssalam)" <ssalam@cisco.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>, "nfinn@cisco.com" <nfinn@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.samsung.android.email_16590888141530"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/lMAwVbLj2AJE0CHcQIejjrJArag>
Subject: Re: [Lime] draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-01 - IPR
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:08:47 -0000

Hi Ron
I am not aware of any IPR,Thanks for following up
Tissa


Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: "Samer Salam (ssalam)" <ssalam@cisco.com> Date: 12/17/17  11:44 PM  (GMT-08:00) To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, lime@ietf.org, tsenevir@gmail.com, nfinn@cisco.com Subject: Re: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-01 - IPR 
Hi Ron,

I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft.


Thanks
Samer

On 2017-12-15, 5:15 PM, "Ron Bonica" <rbonica@juniper.net> wrote:

    Tissa, Norm, Samer,
    
    I am still waiting for your responses.
    
                          Ron
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Ron Bonica
    > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 10:19 AM
    > To: 'lime@ietf.org' <lime@ietf.org>
    > Subject: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-01 - IPR
    > 
    > Deepak, Qin, Michael, Tissa, Norm, Samer,
    > 
    > Could each of you please respond to this email stating whether you have any
    > knowledge of IPR against draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-
    > model-01?
    > 
    >  A response from each of you is required to progress this document.
    > 
    >                                                       Ron
    
   

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email