Re: [Lime] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: (with COMMENT)

[Qin Wu <[e-mail]>]

Good point, thanks David, will fix this.

-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: David Ball [mailto:[e-mail]] 
发送时间: 2018年2月22日 18:38
收件人: Qin Wu; Alvaro Retana; The IESG
抄送: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
主题: Re: [Lime] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: (with COMMENT)

IEEE 802.1ag (an amendment to 802.1Q-2005) was subsumed into (and superseded by) IEEE 802.1Q-2011.  You should refer to the latest version of 802.1Q (which I believe is 802.1Q-2014).


     David


On 22/02/2018 04:05, Qin Wu wrote:
> I have moved IEEE802.1ag to normative, note that there is no other RFCs reference IEEE802.1ag.
>
> -Qin
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Lime [mailto:[e-mail]] 代表 Alvaro Retana
> 发送时间: 2018年2月22日 4:48
> 收件人: The IESG
> 抄送: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; 
> [e-mail]
> 主题: [Lime] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on 
> draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: (with COMMENT)
>
> Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all 
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut 
> this introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to 
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-orien
> ted-oam-model/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> It seems to me that the reference to IEEE802.1ag should be Normative.
>
> "  In this document, we take the CFM [IEEE802.1ag] model and
>     extend it to a technology independent framework and define the
>     corresponding YANG model accordingly."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lime mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime
> _______________________________________________
> Lime mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime

--
David Ball
<[e-mail]>