Re: [Lime] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 22 February 2018 03:14 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C471812E8AD; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:14:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QN5BKlz-Wpw7; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:14:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B6751241FC; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:14:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1442; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1519269243; x=1520478843; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/zSsX2SEqtBRM1YmamL/gAd/b9yXPUTYlqVqmEZHn7A=; b=FiQxRD0dIHo2AR/EJSYEMdP82fR9z/FzFuBJBuLPvcPdI3EsfBa2v0yX 55JgMYxZkgsq5ZmwHZ8gyV+biAuk6bWvePDu8WRdjbPQqtaQqvIkpaoQu TB3fb6IHhZ40nRlZ4ab09J50lokL3/GFNVXilf6jkUA5EKmMHfoXC/nNg M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BMAwDbNI5a/5pdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYNPZnAog2iYHIMZll6CAgolhQ8CgnhYFAECAQEBAQEBAmsohSQ?= =?us-ascii?q?GIw8BBUEQCxoCHwcCAlcGAQwIAQGKHxCqZoInhQCDeIITAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBGAWBD4QCgieBV4FnKYMFgzACAQIBgToBEgGDNoJlBYpyiHiQUQm?= =?us-ascii?q?IJ41mgiCGKYNxiAuOCYIBiByBPDYiYFgRCDMaCBsVgn2DCYILIzcBih2CPgEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?Q?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,376,1515456000"; d="scan'208";a="73631987"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Feb 2018 03:14:02 +0000
Received: from [10.82.244.207] (rtp-vpn2-1231.cisco.com [10.82.244.207]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w1M3E2OR024199; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 03:14:02 GMT
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Mirja_K=c3=bchlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: rbonica@juniper.net, lime-chairs@ietf.org, lime@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model@ietf.org
References: <151908069230.29581.4264640042730170093.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <c9fd49fb-1a3d-cab0-4a83-0890856352f7@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:14:01 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <151908069230.29581.4264640042730170093.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/u1vWDBUyyUK_tt4Ya0kJ-5rQV4Y>
Subject: Re: [Lime] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-?= =?utf-8?q?ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05=3A_=28with_COMM?= =?utf-8?q?ENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 03:14:05 -0000

Hi Mirja,
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-05: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> One question:
> Does this YANG model somehow relate to the lmap YANG model (RFC8194)?
It doesn't.
> I mean at
> least one could probably also use lmap to configure a traceroute in some
> intervals…
Yes, LMAP agents could send OAM traffic.
Now, we have not made the link between the previous LIME documents and LMAP.

Regards, B.
>
> One editorial comment:
> sec 1: This sentence is superfluous as inherently true: „All implementations
> that follow the YANG framework presented in this
>     document MUST implement the generic connection oriented YANG model
>     presented here.“
>
>
> .
>