Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST

Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> Wed, 11 August 2010 09:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ian@hixie.ch>
X-Original-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789B23A6A42 for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.456
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.143, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UyB5TVkF6or2 for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A183A6982 for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:26:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043D34F806A; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=hixie.ch; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version: content-type; q=dns; s=hixie.ch; b=MF3a3vwhpMKE8w+iSmXzkmwM4Vctr dGxXNVNDRozgs51XYpv/HBzP4TLrcBNxdxCMyI4rmcBBAXMo+QcNrVk+KNzwlTiG B+nDxJvwJN7U+obOAq3aK+SQ3XdIEJaXvnuMmOJFZdapfz41Iiaunfb7u0N8eUNa luiqw8L0IZYmyM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=hixie.ch; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version: content-type; s=hixie.ch; bh=ePuiv5nt7OIwm+OKHuHtrewrxBI=; b=zTr 42QeQ/YbyWeSlRWsfcOhqiiHb3QvSUZCvWgwCgTs/v64I0EzhhAw3vlUbPzs13sf OkAfgTnudeuBm4n3lbgpLZeM1g23k6lU7Vtlylvm8e19gfUyXtpbAiI9pbU8Qgrs 9eyl+gwaDfHQ09LTvnCHAdwstAnXWdDEsMTA0ETw=
Received: from ps20323.dreamhostps.com (ps20323.dreamhost.com [69.163.222.251]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: internal@index.hixie.ch) by homiemail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F22094F8065; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:26:44 +0000 (UTC)
From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4C6263B2.9090008@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008110925060.22155@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008100803420.22575@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4C61A497.8080106@gmx.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008102110230.11992@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4C6263B2.9090008@gmx.de>
Content-Language: en-GB-hixie
Content-Style-Type: text/css
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: link-relations@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:26:10 -0000

On Wed, 11 Aug 2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 10.08.2010 23:11, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
> > > On 10.08.2010 20:17, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > The template for this relation is in the specification as requested:
> > > > 
> > > >      http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete.html#rel-alternate-registration
> > > 
> > > (beware - do not open with performance challenged UAs such as FF 3.x :-)
> > > 
> > > This actually is an update for an existing registration. Looking at the
> > > text
> > > from HTML4 and the current text I do not see a problem with the update.
> > > 
> > > That being said, as the original registration refers to an W3C spec, I'd
> > > expect the update to do so as well.
> > 
> > Ok, updated.
> 
> It's now:
> 
> > This is the registration template for this value in the Link Relations
> > registry: [IANALINKTYPE]
> > Relation Name:
> > alternate
> > Description:
> > Gives alternate representations of the current document, provides a link to
> > a syndication feed, or modifies the meaning of other link relations,
> > depending on context.
> > Reference:
> > http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#rel-alternate
> > Notes:
> > (none)
> > Application Data:
> > (none)
> 
> (side note: just because it should be in the spec doesn't mean it doesn't
> *also* make sense to post it here).
> 
> That being said, I'm fine with this registration if it actually refers to the
> W3C Working Draft (that is, <http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/>).

So to be clear, you are rejecting this registration unless it references 
the out-of-date snapshot document on the W3C site rather than either the 
WHATWG document or the current W3C document? (So in particular, you are 
rejecting this registration at least until the next snapshot publication?)

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'