Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relation name: "last"
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 02 March 2011 14:05 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C543A67E3 for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 06:05:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.809
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.809 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.210, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k3qRM5zbu19u for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 06:05:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B18673A67E7 for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2011 06:05:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Mar 2011 14:06:55 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.134]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp014) with SMTP; 02 Mar 2011 15:06:55 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+I9jNEKkaIerZwOecInjD4S0ERs2AptT02Ead6Hx 8Nxam7XzDWKaWj
Message-ID: <4D6E4EF1.5020706@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:06:41 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tim Williams <williamstw@gmail.com>
References: <20100902082030.GV58403@sideshowbarker> <4D6E4086.7020000@gmx.de> <AANLkTin1UP20RaPznZP1VR_N17AgLYSkU6w89ZeXrs3g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin1UP20RaPznZP1VR_N17AgLYSkU6w89ZeXrs3g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, link-relations@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relation name: "last"
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:05:52 -0000
On 02.03.2011 15:00, Tim Williams wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Julian Reschke<julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> On 02.09.2010 10:20, Michael(tm) Smith wrote: >>> >>> Relation Name: >>> last >>> >>> Description: >>> Indicates that the current document is a part of a series, and >>> that the last document in the series is the referenced document. >>> >>> Reference: >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#link-type-last >>> >>> Notes: >>> Template to be added to W3C HTML5 specification before >>> publication of next Working Draft >> >> >> This relation was removed from HTML5 as of today >> (<http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5923&to=5924>). >> >> I therefore propose to set the status to "declined". > > What are the other options here? This relation is important (well, to > me at least) - among other things, I use it a great deal in paging. > Are the options to either get another standard to define it or > introduce it independent of a media type? I should have mentioned that these four were "update" requests; that is, they are already in the link relations registry; see <http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xml>. So the only effect is that we're not going to change the registrations we already have. Best regards, Julian
- [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relation n… Michael(tm) Smith
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relati… Julian Reschke
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relati… Tim Williams
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relati… Julian Reschke
- Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relati… Michael[tm] Smith