IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [link-relations] [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-01.txt

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Mon, 12 September 2011 12:57 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3D721F8512 for <link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 05:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.559
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.559 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.960, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iafZNb3W418w for <link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 05:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 87AAE21F8514 for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 05:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2011 12:59:56 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp059) with SMTP; 12 Sep 2011 14:59:56 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+X0yFFm5eXA8am/OzP64CIEypwVzTo1EABSHh5mt kOnrlT8wE/oijf
Message-ID: <4E6E0243.6040709@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:59:47 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
References: <20110829144145.31952.69055.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4E5D06EA.9040205@gmx.de> <CAKJ_XVBrMLd1CxWUxfeHW2TPPNEmU0uwxiSn1+PN0Dft9ket4Q@mail.gmail.com> <4E5DB9B8.70006@gmail.com> <4E5DD2BF.40801@gmx.de> <4E5DE57B.8070801@gmail.com> <CAGKau1HLOfew40y9dtZ6Q4guZ84adOFrwP8xLAHSKhE=uCZEUQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E6E013E.6080404@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E6E013E.6080404@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: "link-relations@ietf.org" <link-relations@ietf.org>, apps-discuss@ietf.org, Maile Ohye <maileko@gmail.com>, draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [link-relations] [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-01.txt
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:57:56 -0000

On 2011-09-12 14:55, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
> Maile,
>
> Could you please justify why do you want to constrain the requirements
> of your document with HTTP model?
>
> Mykyta Yevstifeyev
> ...

I believe that while the link relation itself is not restricted to 
specific protocols, it still makes sense to explain how it should be 
used with HTTP URIs.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email