Re: Link relation types for non-GET links

Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> Sat, 15 August 2015 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <dret@berkeley.edu>
X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5DD1B2ECE for <link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 06:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zq5MvF-c35Sp for <link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 06:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm02fe.IST.Berkeley.EDU (cm02fe.IST.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.218.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09B4B1B2ECD for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 06:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 205-237-53-208.static.cgocable.ca ([205.237.53.208] helo=dretair11.local) by cm02fe.ist.berkeley.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (auth plain:dret@berkeley.edu) (envelope-from <dret@berkeley.edu>) id 1ZQbtl-00067r-7R; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 06:53:26 -0700
Message-ID: <55CF4452.60404@berkeley.edu>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 09:53:22 -0400
From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: link-relations <link-relations@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Link relation types for non-GET links
References: <CAAzbHvb==Sn_4UUFHKs3H9GYbEfiX=TUjv4FSmNi9R4NEB+DvQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPW_8m5CU++j=8tNBK1Q7KszxsfORnK1-6mxcgUwz9X2R2JTyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAzbHvZGYGNOkuAkc7Fu29maDcbjSf_o54q93Xa+Ggk_fkGHAw@mail.gmail.com> <55CC8C1D.9060900@gmx.de> <CAAzbHva19zw8tzKxSxhMFUSV0RLMFjq94Pb5Z4mc8GseEgrkBw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAzbHva19zw8tzKxSxhMFUSV0RLMFjq94Pb5Z4mc8GseEgrkBw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/link-relations/7zQzTelWNoBYNF8GARxDcYGmFas>
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/link-relations/>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 13:53:28 -0000

hello klaus.

On 2015-08-15 08:16, Klaus Hartke wrote:
> It's just that HTML defines a number of syntactically different
> hypermedia controls (<a>, <img>, <form>), so a spider can understand
> whether the link is safe or not even if it does not recognize the link
> relation type.

http://dret.typepad.com/dretblog/2009/10/links-in-html.html is where 
just out of curiosity i tried to list all of the link types that are 
defined by HTML. but keep in mind that from a logical perspective, these 
are all "link relation types" (except for <link>, which supports and 
requires runtime typing): each of those elements defines a certain kind 
of relationship between the HTML page and a referenced resource, and 
spiders (and other clients) decide based on this relationship whether 
they want to follow a certain link or not.

cheers,

dret.

-- 
erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu  -  tel:+1-510-2061079 |
            | UC Berkeley  -  School of Information (ISchool) |
            | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |