Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relation name: "duplicate"

Seems reasonable to me. 

I see you have Standards Track as the intended status -- have to talked to an AD about its future?

Regards,

On 12/11/2010, at 11:27 AM, Anthony Bryan wrote:

> Relation Name:
>   duplicate
> 
> Description:
>   Refers to a resource whose available representations
>   are byte-for-byte identical with the corresponding representations of
>   the context IRI.
> 
> Reference:
>   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bryan-metalinkhttp
> 
> Notes:
>   This relation is for static resources.  That is, an HTTP GET
>   request on any duplicate will return the same representation.  It
>   does not make sense for dynamic or POSTable resources and should not
>   be used for them.
> 
> -- 
> (( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [ http://www.metalinker.org ]
>   )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads
> _______________________________________________
> link-relations mailing list
> link-relations@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/