IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relation name: "duplicate"

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Tue, 16 November 2010 08:45 UTC

Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5993A69CE for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:45:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.429
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.429 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.830, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1wWMHn8S3F7N for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:45:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AD553A6DB3 for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:45:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2010 08:46:21 -0000
Received: from dslb-094-223-178-207.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO xn--bjrn-6qa.xn--hhrmann-90a.de) [94.223.178.207] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 16 Nov 2010 09:46:21 +0100
X-Authenticated: #723575
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX196xQ9UICR6TfCCYtL9Tfddo5q6LNp+S0gLk4Tk8r VvqvAW2U7U6iU9
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:46:40 +0100
Message-ID: <usg4e6tkoo55fk4jscukn4jdkkp8s8pa4d@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <AANLkTinUGf=2MKxnBvaiy-9UQJbDfQVwb-zpDx=L0BAO@mail.gmail.com> <20101113084026.GB23318@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20101113084026.GB23318@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com>, link-relations@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relation name: "duplicate"
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:45:40 -0000

* Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 07:27:55PM -0500,
> Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com> wrote 
> a message of 25 lines which said:
>
>>    Refers to a resource whose available representations are
>>    byte-for-byte
>
>Was there any discussion (pointer, please) on this choice of defining
>it as a byte-for-byte equivalence? Because it will be quite strict,
>meaning that two very same XML documents, with the same infoset but
>different representations (for instance, UTF-8 + NFC and UTF-8 without
>NFC), will not be regarded as "duplicate". 

(That is a very bad example, an XML document that is in NFC cannot have
the same Infoset as an XML document that is not in NFC, even Canonical
XML does not emply character normalization if the input is UTF-8.)
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email