Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST - pingback

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 13 August 2010 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BEE3A693D for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 02:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.084
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.084 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.485, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xzZtPerAWBhh for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 02:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D74F43A6768 for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 02:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2010 09:58:06 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.147]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp048) with SMTP; 13 Aug 2010 11:58:06 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/5gPF6ZVP5OEWxzbUs/gzr25tAniuchnlVOyvL/U C1jwCHvPUsJkSI
Message-ID: <4C651723.6030507@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:57:55 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008102113040.11992@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <69D54950-1FE2-4714-9FED-569142BBF1A4@mnot.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008110320320.11977@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <B287E435-5C63-448B-ACD9-E3319FCDBF14@mnot.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008110344060.22155@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008110344060.22155@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: link-relations@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST - pingback
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:57:35 -0000

Maybe there's middle ground:

- have short RFC that defines the link relation in general

- have that document reference the "old" spec for the description of a 
specific pingback service implementation.

Best regards, Julian