Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relation name: "archives"

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 06 April 2011 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7383A6874 for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.812
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.812 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.213, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id geLGzTZqTpkO for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CFBDE3A6819 for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Apr 2011 15:55:32 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.131]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 06 Apr 2011 17:55:32 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19bESF1YwBbUT+6+2tWYM8sccNzx1c+hyVyS0w0JS rqWNbLjy+Qj/7o
Message-ID: <4D9C8CE9.4000304@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 17:55:21 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
References: <20100902081434.GE58403@sideshowbarker> <4CCD6965.1000901@gmx.de> <4D6E4C8C.9070404@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4D6E4C8C.9070404@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: link-relations@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relation name: "archives"
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:53:53 -0000

On 02.03.2011 14:56, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 31.10.2010 14:04, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 02.09.2010 10:14, Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
>>> Relation Name:
>>> archives
>>>
>>> Description:
>>> Provides a link to a collection of records, documents, or other
>>> materials of historical interest.
>>>
>>> Reference:
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#link-type-archives
>>>
>>> Notes:
>>> Template to be added to W3C HTML5 specification before
>>> publication of next Working Draft
>>
>> Sounds good to me.
>
> This definition was just removed from the Editor's draft of HTML5.
> Should it get published as a Working Draft, the reference in the IANA
> registry will be dangling.
>
> The simplest possible fix will be to make the link go specifically to
> the current Working Draft
> (<http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-html5-20110113/links.html#rel-archives>),
> which is immutable.

In the meantime, a new WD has been published, so the links in the 
registry are now dangling.

Should we (a) remove the registrations, or (b) change the links to go to 
the previous WD?

Mike, any preference?

BR, Julian