Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST "archives", was: NEW RELATION REQUEST

Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> Sun, 15 August 2010 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ian@hixie.ch>
X-Original-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBC03A6873 for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.473
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.473 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.126, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2nbV0BnO-j6E for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a54.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118203A68D0 for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a54.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a54.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF5B3A406B; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=hixie.ch; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version: content-type; q=dns; s=hixie.ch; b=SE3g70LPCdkV9o2jhZNanDzAAbzsC oP+EhigXnCahp6iN0589oHwQIkQJbNWLE9k6kcA0svHWFkDe+IrRuaOVj6IHD0/x HVpTjcJA3qmAK03clBo5NlTXjH44iJ4eDHVfpDGyRZ4TLdeaX4lvOZyiYJb1POCp Y73XgCTXBeaLIQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=hixie.ch; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references:mime-version: content-type; s=hixie.ch; bh=/6n2u8tLs2XsNrLUlgeqWya5S6w=; b=fxh t85Y+bwzhtGlJxn8S2Etrn360fs3Q2Q+arTkEX18GMwl1NTqDN0SFhYW6bGnozaf /3LXMceKMZ9sAUzLP1FzTgD1gydikntwq0DxZQwjWpqDPLClRlaanJatmnMv1B42 N9Swx1YcntbjPwA6wp5vbvKdad/pdaNaqzltl3xc=
Received: from ps20323.dreamhostps.com (ps20323.dreamhost.com [69.163.222.251]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: internal@index.hixie.ch) by homiemail-a54.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA1433A4065; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:11:36 +0000
From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4C67B623.7080100@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008151610080.19139@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008102110390.11977@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4C67B623.7080100@gmx.de>
Content-Language: en-GB-hixie
Content-Style-Type: text/css
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: link-relations@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST "archives", was: NEW RELATION REQUEST
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:11:06 -0000

On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 10.08.2010 23:15, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > 
> > The template for this relation is in the specification as requested:
> > 
> >     http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete.html#rel-archives-registration
> 
> Sorry, I missed this request because it looked like a duplicate of the 
> one for "alternate". It would probably a good idea to add the name of 
> the actual relation to the subject line.

The Web Linking specification says to use "NEW RELATION REQUEST".


> Format-wise, the same comments apply as for "alternate".

Could you elaborate? The only problem I recall regarding "alternate" was 
regarding the W3C being the previously-used reference for the keyword, 
which doesn't seem relevant here since it's not a registered keyword.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'