Re: adding "pingback"

Sure.

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:52 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> No drama, we can add it.
>
> Ian, does this look right to you?
>
> Relation Name: pingback
> Description: Gives the address of the pingback resource for the link
> context
> Reference: http://www.hixie.ch/specs/pingback/pingback
> Notes:
> Application Data:
>
>
> > On 26 Nov 2015, at 3:11 am, Erik Wilde <erik.wilde@dret.net> wrote:
> >
> > hello.
> >
> > http://www.hixie.ch/specs/pingback/pingback defines a "pingback"
> relation that seems to have some adoption. the spec itself does not contain
> an IANA registration. however, since it is a relation that is in use, maybe
> it would make sense to add it to the IANA link relation type registry?
> >
> > what is the process to add a link relation where the spec does not
> contain an IANA registration, but implementation and adoption suggest that
> including the value in the registry would be helpful for people
> encountering this relation on the web?
> >
> > thanks and kind regards,
> >
> > dret.
> >
> > --
> > erik wilde | mailto:erik.wilde@dret.net |
> >           | http://dret.net/netdret    |
> >           | http://twitter.com/dret    |
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > link-relations mailing list
> > link-relations@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>