IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [link-relations] An Internet Draft template for writing a Link Relation specification

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 07 December 2010 08:49 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194053A6892 for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 00:49:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.850, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S0OeDTIT2IT4 for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 00:49:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E9DC43A688B for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 00:49:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Dec 2010 08:50:26 -0000
Received: from p508FCB2C.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.33]) [80.143.203.44] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 07 Dec 2010 09:50:26 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/E980E2dLEXz65yy7V0Bn8P3EUQOKsHs91L0TOBb ENrcevD7JlqkT3
Message-ID: <4CFDF54F.7080603@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 09:50:23 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
References: <4CFBAC1D.5090604@gmx.de> <AANLkTim6kvzLLDEDdOD5gsXO9Vwag1Jbb8_VpqqpyiYp@mail.gmail.com> <E6BA6AB7-A2CA-4B97-A7AF-5916064BE2E8@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <E6BA6AB7-A2CA-4B97-A7AF-5916064BE2E8@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: link-relations@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [link-relations] An Internet Draft template for writing a Link Relation specification
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:49:03 -0000

On 07.12.2010 03:59, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> We're happy to give advice about what makes a good relation, specification text, etc. here, and asking for that advice early on, rather than last minute, is much preferred. :)
>
> Generally, though, the discussion of a relation itself should probably happen within the community that's appropriate to it -- whether that's HTML5, uFormats, RDF, etc. We will try to get the right people involved if something starts here, of course, but it's easier when the community hammers out the basics ahead of time, so we're not minting things that aren't connected to running code.
> ...

Yup.

If there's no other place, apps-discuss or the atom-syntax may be good 
choices. (The draft template says "apps-discuss").

However, if there are question with respect to how to phrase the 
definition, such as with respect to media formats or validity in certain 
contexts by all means post them here...

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email