IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION - canonical

Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Mon, 06 June 2011 00:00 UTC

Return-Path: <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F61011E8081 for <link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 17:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JyRxyKHBTZq6 for <link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 17:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9686911E8075 for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 17:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so1760666pzk.31 for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=yWADkR7c/gc+RF87K3JDt7YRwx0Ohd51t71c1dgM/SM=; b=na2WOmbTeuXsE28Iw1YgFTjk1Ypqegu+zIAb1FhIQGX4ET2pdlICm+ggwI5uuxbTxy OgceU8EbyLSVG8+lBcgvW6T4dmClfEC7hBDeT31rOyT0jCXQXwPeL3EBjSj1meDZTd6Z rntzimEmv3kyAClYvWJAU2RG/b0ilBP3d4AcE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=WOsjR3KGfnRYO6nVIX3Jmo1HzJBEdUWUCfg+5OFZ0h4t1n6MPCMKM2HPVYcj42onoT BxNVRC7LuKigr07x7jsSdxq/kTy0TihNM9MmGmyKGpHAmIdBQqDJUwdz8rkxIApVenCt gkhMFF2llX7GgM/aUpdMqoELFJfi+gwuOUpm0=
Received: by 10.142.208.20 with SMTP id f20mr616943wfg.403.1307318405190; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.143.34.19 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 16:59:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DE953F9.2060609@stpeter.im>
References: <BANLkTikDYGMKinQh1xFKfQFVjaoSDcX0KA@mail.gmail.com> <4DA88EA7.3060405@gmx.de> <4DE945D6.4020500@stpeter.im> <BANLkTi=Xb7OxLfrktOCy+Fd8ymPjErG4rg@mail.gmail.com> <4DE953F9.2060609@stpeter.im>
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 01:59:45 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTik2qGgLnRUi=qSWLA=31z2=ksT_mw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: link-relations <link-relations@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION - canonical
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:00:06 -0000

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:

> Julian posted earlier on this list that it would be
> nice to have a spec, but I leave it up to the DEs
> whether a link to a blog post is acceptable, i.e.:

> http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/02/specify-your-canonical.html

Indeed, it would be nice to have a proper specification.

But it would be also nice to get a clear decision for a
registration request posted in April based on the Google
webmaster help article as ersatz-spec -- IMO slightly
better than an expired I-D or old blog entry.

Frank

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email