Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relation name: "duplicate"

Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com> Tue, 16 November 2010 08:11 UTC

Return-Path: <anthonybryan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173B33A6DB9 for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:11:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.367
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.367 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.232, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2LT-Nq5wxZNI for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:11:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423FA3A6DB3 for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:11:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so135612eyd.31 for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:12:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pEkqWmQQRw466QbG/LEXplEXd8vE1fNigHthlaX1esk=; b=EORS9y6LdtVKu3a1x66qf6Rvr7ON448DIbtgVbAc8rJVaH+4iU1ZaqtR3a9jDNdOcT yf+oQSUZz+ISEEQma1t6bmn2D6vH/CnrZPsO3xsjH7IlfQVhkW6dKfmn3f8jav63txWR DMfo2n9ve67o+W/wKpXWocapFpBO1zWeS2yYU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZV3EjUZVbDnjm1zj2Ac+2OSjTsxq57ZHeG+eLo0uV/P4X0oGcxlWsQ+bJ/0TlTzmDA we36o2XgA3FH4drp5Pl69FWvFhvjgjtGlTm4I+TvnKqktiN9DKeIA1xazVgzRFHDtKUg B+PhxzivKE3fqJN2vGi7IAgyHQJQVOj2h7V8o=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.213.7.18 with SMTP id b18mr6392230ebb.63.1289895136509; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:12:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.28.2 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:12:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E674F00B-161C-4329-A772-FE9EF1C89BD8@mnot.net>
References: <AANLkTinUGf=2MKxnBvaiy-9UQJbDfQVwb-zpDx=L0BAO@mail.gmail.com> <E674F00B-161C-4329-A772-FE9EF1C89BD8@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 03:12:16 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTik7Q+PJWG_4A257RRtuwh7r7JrBnkMM=sE2sRs-@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:27:53 -0800
Cc: link-relations@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relation name: "duplicate"
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:11:36 -0000

yes, I have.

are you asking about intended document status or about moving the
document forward?

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> Seems reasonable to me.
>
> I see you have Standards Track as the intended status -- have to talked to an AD about its future?
>
> Regards,
>
>
> On 12/11/2010, at 11:27 AM, Anthony Bryan wrote:
>
>> Relation Name:
>>   duplicate
>>
>> Description:
>>   Refers to a resource whose available representations
>>   are byte-for-byte identical with the corresponding representations of
>>   the context IRI.
>>
>> Reference:
>>   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bryan-metalinkhttp
>>
>> Notes:
>>   This relation is for static resources.  That is, an HTTP GET
>>   request on any duplicate will return the same representation.  It
>>   does not make sense for dynamic or POSTable resources and should not
>>   be used for them.
>>
>> --
>> (( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [ http://www.metalinker.org ]
>>   )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads
>> _______________________________________________
>> link-relations mailing list
>> link-relations@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>



-- 
(( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [ http://www.metalinker.org ]
  )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads