Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION - annotation-server (request for review)

Your draft makes normative reference to Annotea specification, but lacks 
of clear description how it is connected to it.  Also, a link to 
<http://www.w3.org/2001/Annotea/User/Protocol> is missing there.

Mykyta

08.09.2011 4:43, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> Hello Mark, Eran, Julian,
>
> I just updated my http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-anno-link 
> for the "annotation-server" link relationship. I would like to get 
> your (and everybody else's on this list) input on it. The registration 
> template is as follows:
>
> >>>>>>>>
>    Relation Name:
>       annotation-server
>
>    Description:
>       Designates an annotation server used to store annotations
>       for the link's context.
>
>    Reference:
>       RFC YYYY [RFC Editor: Please replace with actual RFC number.]
>
>    Notes:
>       currently none
>
>    Application Data:
>       currently none
> <<<<<<<<
>
> I don't think I'm on this list, so please keep me in the cc.
>
> Regards,    Martin.
> _______________________________________________
> link-relations mailing list
> link-relations@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations
>