[link-relations] HTML APP Data
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 22 March 2011 12:22 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD73B28C11A for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 05:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.731
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.731 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.132, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b3Jn3VavVUVs for <link-relations@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 05:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 75AFA28C10D for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 05:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2011 12:23:31 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.134]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp054) with SMTP; 22 Mar 2011 13:23:31 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18LEc8kvokL6Uv1RXCwBsCKCJ7Amzt5Zeernyv8gv HmdN7fZvDro8H5
Message-ID: <4D8894BC.6000201@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:23:24 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "link-relations@ietf.org" <link-relations@ietf.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Subject: [link-relations] HTML APP Data
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:22:01 -0000
Hi, the HTML WG has finally decided on the open issue of link relation metadata (see <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/124> and <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0401.html>). On the other hand, the base issue on whether the HTML spec should use the IANA registry is not yet decided, but getting a survey: <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/27> and <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0349.html>. Mike, should we go ahead and look at the APP data again, or would it make more sense to wait on a decision on ISSUE-27 before proceeding? (After all, if the HTML WG doesn't care about harmonization with this registry then adding the flags provides little benefit, but quite some overhead). Best regards, Julian
- [link-relations] HTML APP Data Julian Reschke