Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION: collection

[Julian Reschke <[e-mail]>]

On 2011-08-06 09:30, mike amundsen wrote:
> Relation Name:
> collection
>
> Description:
> The target IRI points to a resource which represents a list of which
> the context  IRI is a member.
>
> References:
> http://www.opensearch.org/Specifications/OpenSearch/1.1#Url_rel_values
> http://amundsen.com/media-types/maze/format/#link-relations
> http://amundsen.com/media-types/collection/format/#link-relations
>
> Notes:
> Logged with the Microformats Existing Rel Values.
> The OpenSearch definition is different than that given above
> ("Represents a request for a set of resources.")
>
> Application Data:
> None

A few questions:

Is Opensearch using link relations in the RFC 5988 sense? That is, do 
they share the same space of names?

Also, if this is a new relation name, wouldn't "contained-in" or 
something like that be more accurate? (yep, that's bikeshedding)

Finally:

 > http://amundsen.com/media-types/maze/format/#link-relations
 > http://amundsen.com/media-types/collection/format/#link-relations

It would be great if there was a single document defining the link 
relation independently of a specific media type.

Best regards, Julian