Re: NEW RELATION - transaction-participant

Jan,

Thanks, we’re only doing a PoC / beta right now, the documentation will be updated after it works. What do you mean with “submitted as an I-D”?

Guy

On 01 Jun 2017, at 15:12, Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@icloud.com> wrote:

Guy,

On 1 Jun 2017, at 14:52, Guy Pardon wrote:

> Hi experts,
> 
> We’d like to add the following relation name:
> 
>   o  Relation Name: transaction-participant
> 
>   o  Description: URI of a service participating in a distributed HTTP/REST transaction and subject to two-phase commit termination
> 
>   o  Reference: https://www.atomikos.com/Blog/ACIDTransactionsAcrossMicroservices
> 
> 

The idea sounds fine to me. I think the referenced documentation however, should probably be submitted as an I-D and at least mention the link relation type?

Jan

> Thank you!
> 
> Guy
> 
> Dr. Guy Pardon, CTO | Atomikos BVBA | http://www.atomikos.com
> Phone: +32 15 61 30 55 | Twitter: @guypardon | Skype: guypardon
> Default Timezone: CET (local time: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=48)
> The information in this email is confidential and only meant for the addressee(s). The content of this email is informal and will not be legally binding for Atomikos.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> link-relations mailing list
> link-relations@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations