Re: [lisp] Draft-kouvelas-lisp-map-server-reliable-transport WG Adoption

Actually there is, predictive-rlocs. No messaging is better than .5 RTT in control-plane. But might not be fair to compare since you have to send data to more places that may get dropped.

Dino

> On Apr 22, 2022, at 1:39 PM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@GMAIL.COM> wrote:
> 
> Nothing is better than .5 RTT.  ;-)
> 
> Dino
> 
>> On Apr 22, 2022, at 1:18 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Dino,
>> 
>>> If you use a transport layer that requires connection setup, it will slow down handoff time when EIDs are moving.
>> 
>> But quic connection setup is just 3 RTTs. Is that an issue ? 
>> 
>> Thx,
>> R.
>> 
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 8:40 PM Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The others know to add quic, it was part of a discussion on how to open sockets using QUIC and which port numbers to use. That text is coming. The drfat does intend to support multiple transports. Here is one excerpt that proves that:
>> 
>> <Screen Shot 2022-04-22 at 11.37.47 AM.png>
>> 
>> QUIC will be added to the list above.
>> 
>> To answer your second question. If you use a transport layer that requires connection setup, it will slow down handoff time when EIDs are moving. So in that case, a Map-Reqister should just be sent over UDP. And on the Map-Request side you will require an RTT before getting the map-cache populated.
>> 
>> Dino
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 22, 2022, at 11:11 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Dino,
>>> 
>>> Before I hit sent I did search the draft and did not find any match on QUIC :( 
>>> 
>>> But to your question - yes. I see no reason why LISP control plane could not be running over QUIC. 
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> R.
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 7:59 PM Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The draft indicates QUIC can be used as a reliable transport. But are you saying QUIC should be used for all LISP messages?
>>> 
>>> Dino
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 22, 2022, at 6:35 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> May I ask for reasons not to use QUIC instead of home made UDP based transport followed by TCP ? 
>>>> 
>>>> Many thx,
>>>> Robert
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 9:42 AM Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>> 
>>>> During the last LISP WG meeting in Vienna/Meetecho the authors of the draft:
>>>> 
>>>> LISP Map Server Reliable Transport
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kouvelas-lisp-map-server-reliable-transport/
>>>> 
>>>> Asked for adoption as WG document.
>>>> Call for adoption during the meeting showed clear consensus.
>>>> This email is the usual procedure to confirm the consensus on the mailing list.
>>>> 
>>>> If anybody has concerns about adopting this document please state so on the mailing list before May 5th 2022. 
>>>> Please also argument the technical reason why you have concerns.
>>>> 
>>>> Ciao
>>>> 
>>>> Luigi & Joel
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> lisp mailing list
>>>> lisp@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> lisp mailing list
>>>> lisp@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>>> 
>> 
> 