IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Draft LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases

Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Fri, 26 April 2024 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED67AC14F713 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W68uapXYrBIu for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB87C14CF0C for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VR5FR6WR0z6H0n7; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1714166347; bh=fLggAM7esf1rxF3dQH7eOt4FOj8k6OfEzV63f4W3m4g=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=TcT5M090uIaZqd6n68GIAryi1NbxKJj+E9EDsZjsVzE02Vw3ISTeBumy7d89iUUK0 r+GfsiNrW1yDv+cjIrfddMKpcER2EeA3zWxKxNK21QyhuWnR+c52HjU0JhMsuSoQO7 XW9GwScVwj8tozzdAUW+NQ7ZYeran3Ch0Orqj9rU=
X-Quarantine-ID: <FLvyPCOH8r9B>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.23.1] (unknown [50.233.136.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4VR5FR1H4Fz6G9lZ; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <77834c57-25e9-4233-8184-e04e926b8895@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:19:05 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Cc: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
References: <342E1E96-411C-4F1B-99EF-3364B141D813@gigix.net> <1D52EF56-5BB4-46C8-9FB7-89B02F9B6A19@gmail.com> <AD3EB7FC-62C0-4C42-872C-CA89EC971841@gigix.net> <434D1744-E125-4B70-92EE-D19BEC625A22@gigix.net> <0F914B6F-F91E-43B2-B1BB-DB2FF232B6FA@gmail.com> <0B735DFE-A8A3-4134-9850-3A20DAFB5A2C@gigix.net> <125E923F-C2F4-45F2-BF8B-B01532009C13@gmail.com> <847a43dd-9ea6-4d71-8dc4-596e12141d8e@joelhalpern.com> <8D26E0F6-0BCC-48DC-9738-18A4AAF0B39B@gigix.net> <AB5D0213-EE61-4918-9E7A-FE616B1C9EA8@gmail.com> <46b85844-252f-498a-8dec-caf70cd5f5f4@joelhalpern.com> <F595DB82-2BE7-49BE-8FA0-A4381D405746@gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <F595DB82-2BE7-49BE-8FA0-A4381D405746@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/-Py05XGfn0GlJ7hLTpr2iuYvR9o>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Draft LISP Geo-Coordinate Use-Cases
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 21:19:48 -0000

Can you find an on-list email where such a conclusion was reached.  That 
would certainly explain your choice.

Yours,

Joel

On 4/26/2024 5:15 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>> I gather you decided to change the encoding to match some other work.  But you chose not to use a different code point when you did so.  You simply changed the meaning, without updating the published RFC.
> We did not change the code point because it was decided by the working group, as I recall, that we could modify RFC 8060 with the new format from lisp-geo.
>
>> Sorry, that is squatting on and misusing a code point.  The correct remedy is for the squatter to move to use a different code point.    Even if you think there are no implementations of the code point from the RFC.  (Which would be very hard to know, since no, you don't consult to all the implementors.)
> This was so long ago, but we asked, and I for one, thought that was the decision. And I believe, that cisco went the same route as my implementation.
>
> Dino
>
>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status