IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lisp] Re: Review draft-ietf-lisp-te

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Thu, 13 June 2024 22:16 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D388CC1CAF4C; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jfODmlDPZ_xQ; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BEADC1D6FD1; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6f4603237e0so1142000b3a.0; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:16:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718317001; x=1718921801; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=grpbGpyNMzVggPc+Fq0kAKmPoe/fg++Pfk3D6Q5u/NM=; b=ZfrO3rbcxutayB4cA8TtyiGEU8PrW+UeyQF5cfjTHQDQYoUfMv4g5BhUTPBEQSASqO XEXm43FBjegvWfbz9VmoHqA/kRXW1a+STU3BO084okMrj7tT/sU7vSxOUzxKzWAMHCYl +mhbTeOsXXcBv7Y/0DPvJPNND+6C75SZVjx1tbWDl9ndNzWYC/b7uHnXVJnjtBpKduDJ /MwB9AvJMHm7BvCa9K1hIzWXsLtBpNb7jP65+mngyis7mZSMxoHpFmL0bYs343uneC62 QrOAMXi+oK/MPgfpEM+g7uurIQW5XdHNiJeyYzwcJoZS0eXhymy0DlbITWh2VO7+l2Bk b+ZQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718317001; x=1718921801; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=grpbGpyNMzVggPc+Fq0kAKmPoe/fg++Pfk3D6Q5u/NM=; b=jjtoM2U0I3M5SVbExYd+l35qF4fwh50nMzQ84iSwp9XlMQPDVtoDAoklepGGByGA8O sBbKSQdsEcD6PPYe22tnBLMhZC11pwxHYk+gJcq9w1sk6mogpP9YcFoQocwJamQa2RG6 a2FoArpGVbkXUpWPfsszmXXex4qfLcch1n6HjEdc72Mhz3KAbENThRdDVaM4WasqO4UR 45MaocPAhcz9zqwIjh9lYv2qlU8SMvr+TY83cNKbW7CZUVk7qpN/Rtd/E49CR+GGOMO5 qz2HD5bSa3mE/UuRu/g4DeUOAyHsSMed8gnHcVDf7/Z6WWSRLS7qBnfm+nKpU7ZJAdnp nO1Q==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW8eTyM/CMsHR4+M/6QSBqhcXn9tmdYWDQ4ltXNSbMCg3oYFSO9kDKa8MRETbj2e52sZkPDlMcD7V+CLbF8GJKt0ScfvDqMCMvkBDbmcXzx4tRisw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzmXWN4ZVtdhl4Mdh9gXWJrFZ2em8O2BpyghquCobAQW5FwJ+9D Y4SmH1qeiLKbpb0NoP+iCwMyld7DL+76fCKZL6AJySZ/wwntebzv
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEP1o6jJGCgRpMTP5ukq0+Z5wpPiaz27uYgnIs83J9tEldw4/ygyS2uvBLNir0Ggpw3Ywoa7g==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2f17:b0:705:95f2:880b with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-705d6ade91bmr1266096b3a.14.1718317000792; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-24-5-184-219.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.184.219]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-705cc91db4csm1901690b3a.18.2024.06.13.15.16.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.300.61.1.2\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5107A452-EDEF-439A-A2A7-7830B2C77C74@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:16:29 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4917E1CF-4F87-47BE-B9A4-F05704B9EC62@gmail.com>
References: <DEBC07FE-B74F-4D17-A77E-CB5D19B108F8@gmail.com> <5107A452-EDEF-439A-A2A7-7830B2C77C74@gmail.com>
To: Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.300.61.1.2)
Message-ID-Hash: BZOOQUUVOJLSMLVAMQGBNE5QJP2BTOL4
X-Message-ID-Hash: BZOOQUUVOJLSMLVAMQGBNE5QJP2BTOL4
X-MailFrom: farinacci@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-lisp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [lisp] Re: Review draft-ietf-lisp-te
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/07QiHBJ-53t81BUZyXin6GNhbYg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:lisp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:lisp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:lisp-leave@ietf.org>

> Here is where i wonder whether strict would have been best to drop the packet and not go to n+1 per the example for SFC where there are mandatory services.
> 
> I think it might be worthwhile to document this behavior so as there are no surprises.
> Thoughts?

Will add. Thanks.

Dino

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status