[lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.txt
Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 10 January 2026 01:42 UTC
Return-Path: <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: lisp@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C28A5A6A2D for <lisp@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 17:42:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TETp_3Ye-7T8 for <lisp@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 17:42:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com (mail-lj1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A43BA5A6A20 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 17:42:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-382fd8aaa6eso33286411fa.1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Jan 2026 17:42:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1768009319; x=1768614119; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JxG4T5FbWjNquFfj3QLtBYmdMQr3v0ZXF/QP5VGXKg0=; b=j5Q4c9wAwjTNji6p6c0bGCuB1lAJ+HxzOzf4yZnVcFbHhop5iW+vHItMvWEe8ifWct VMwQqkxgf4JRKLrIB3t7AcbW0DWB7J0El/rfSuC/Zb5ed66jUOBPqFqKaZ6iejEZQZMB ZEGgtEcn6GHgyNeNEq2i+4f7GSd2///NKek9GxF/zqvo7MLeCLDtvPn+cj9g/4Kpmq5q OP6cRoQuc8GCC/mrTlSSQrtucDy99VYtWKFainPbv6sOyvJy/bgwNhidok34ZkPYm/0y eI3hPX+K7VswAfqo9AXinAUr1kR0vaUYnGpZTIxtKIqxst2rgjD6SOsSZFQX1idBZQ47 pCKw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1768009319; x=1768614119; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=JxG4T5FbWjNquFfj3QLtBYmdMQr3v0ZXF/QP5VGXKg0=; b=jTPkAMNtrqcV/w6NwTqIfnaRSIt0/2AZlgqLULtJsfuniu/TE1RIpYMMMAc+OfADtj lSq+f4Rh29EuwJJrFvaWWJ0M3TlTpjaBOHkYDCo6Lx4WIaeJYsjD7HHFmQUFMjdI9iJh rrVQyE9Wsi7j9BWzO3VtncAdnx5fTxBZXedfm60cctgXB6DFZICeB1vS2C7jBAw1bKDx TA2inHC0pKenGdcAyV7GqKe67P7LZYW33l/LXlNm4bWs/wcWO7mMGMvWtfteOvn/Al9/ 5Boak3zgVPmnBgfsJJZWPavNvGqFV2rhS6MejeAvigsvmHjIQwUlFQ2nnhfO7P61gVd3 HNtQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXYSHNQTX9tkCA93s4TFmSuiCXPaZGS6fJ0B0xyW1/s895o3t13UGIU+hAIT4mmpep2KF6e@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxg5zFS9pVfaZuXBhDEgDDjKeRG+XDGw5UkXoqwhSe2jDmzNyTY DpzEW7bYqf+x6PbJ90pXnxQh7LZQz1Y56yMemPZNure3dQRkyMbOvNrI3Dfkipkog9wzRbBdeJj DK1aaLG9sllzMN2hI6sWD1zL0iZQqIok=
X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX5P63UrhiK1cdxpgwPa8HTTiK2B6FivcNYhmKyJ3maRtZh/53bojiqlBTX2uYk UGhk75AgpsEvYpbruRjlecx+3KWy27e3pQENhKK1hc96toxOy0DKCs4pEsBKvljP34Lix/mUOGQ 4PktqCG2qozVhVptHWvcdhpbAhM6U4E6nlO+WrqIPMnbaZEl4E3dLtF+HgbVGxv+NiYgDOJjq28 AXyM/x672vClqhBbe1hX6knQGhwDyteLYjUIEarkbAqCRiS4YOjZdtySH/YbeRsW52DS7Q=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE+euEpvoGChmvbyWPAnt56cZwo4rDX+MVNmipjxllRQX8WqqmoC3MQUOdrBhrJQZsZYwjax+1DsuC5RzonYPo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:150b:b0:383:282b:7ac5 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-383282b9013mr5114891fa.25.1768009318898; Fri, 09 Jan 2026 17:41:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <176800633753.260671.6895206452673113136@dt-datatracker-5656579b89-r5kdq>
In-Reply-To: <176800633753.260671.6895206452673113136@dt-datatracker-5656579b89-r5kdq>
From: Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 17:41:47 -0800
X-Gm-Features: AZwV_Qi5d8SeDdBiV36rfBlkIoq6RQvyWQw-f3zb0nRW5gFyvH-po6spKGaXEHs
Message-ID: <CAG-CQxqrOtvviJ+ayck6UKJte9RFE79HSUf5WNd5xN0nCK1yQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dd@dhruvdhody.com>, BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, ketant.ietf@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000069a1260647febfe3"
Message-ID-Hash: 5E2FATJQ4GKPN3TGCUSS6ZCWZXLWGMIS
X-Message-ID-Hash: 5E2FATJQ4GKPN3TGCUSS6ZCWZXLWGMIS
X-MailFrom: padma.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-lisp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lisp-te@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.txt
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/14sad3S2y8uMB28WR88XiOS3xkM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:lisp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:lisp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:lisp-leave@ietf.org>
Hello Everyone
Thank you again for your review and comments.
The version -24 addresses all comments on the LC.
Thanks
Padma on behalf of all authors
For your convenience i have the tracking table for these changes below
*ID*
*Reviewer*
*Type*
*Comment / Issue*
*Where Addressed*
*First Fixed In*
MED-1
Mohamed Boucadair
DISCUSS
Doc readiness / LC follow-ups
Manageability & Ops
*-24*
MED-2
Mohamed Boucadair
DISCUSS
Experimental status justification
Introduction
*-22*
MED-3
Mohamed Boucadair
DISCUSS
Deployment incentives missing
Deployment Incentives
*-24*
MED-4
Mohamed Boucadair
DISCUSS
Underlay control overstated
Deployment Incentives
*-24*
MED-5
Mohamed Boucadair
DISCUSS
Must not replace underlay protection
Deployment Incentives
*-24*
MED-6
Mohamed Boucadair
DISCUSS
Failure example viability
Deployment Incentives
*-24*
MED-7
Mohamed Boucadair
DISCUSS
Service chaining rationale
Deployment Incentives / Service Chaining
*-24*
MED-8
Mohamed Boucadair
DISCUSS
Existing service chaining not addressed
Service Chaining
*-24*
MED-9
Mohamed Boucadair
DISCUSS
Policy reasons insufficient
Deployment Incentives
*-24*
MED-10
Mohamed Boucadair
DISCUSS
Interception risk acknowledgment
Deployment Incentives / Security
*-24*
DHRUV-1
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
No manageability section
Manageability & Ops
*-23*
DHRUV-2
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
How ELPs are set
Manageability & Ops
*-23*
DHRUV-3
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
How ELPs are monitored
Manageability & Ops
*-23*
DHRUV-4
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
Packet drops (MUSTs)
Manageability & Ops
*-23*
DHRUV-5
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
Logging expectations
Manageability & Ops
*-23*
DHRUV-6
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
Failure signaling
Manageability & Ops
*-23*
DHRUV-7
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
Troubleshooting guidance
Manageability & Ops
*-23*
DHRUV-8
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
Verify ELP compliance
Manageability / ELP Probing
*-23*
DHRUV-9
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
YANG requirements
Manageability & Ops
*-23*
DHRUV-10
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
Multiple mapping systems
Manageability & Ops
*-23*
DHRUV-11
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
Bad ELP impact
Manageability & Ops
*-23*
DHRUV-12
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
ELP validation responsibility
Manageability & Ops
*-23*
DHRUV-13
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
Experimental vs Standards
Introduction
*-22*
DHRUV-14
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
“No protocol change” claim
Abstract / Intro
*-22*
DHRUV-15
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
“New RLOC encoding” wording
Abstract
*-22*
DHRUV-16
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
Terminology clarity
Definitions
*-22*
DHRUV-17
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
RTR scalability
Manageability & Ops
*-23*
DHRUV-18
Dhruv Dhody
OPSDIR
Overall ops readiness
Sections 1, 6, 10, 11
*-23*
GORRY-1
Gorry Fairhurst
DISCUSS
ELP probing underspecified
ELP Probing
*-22*
GORRY-2
Gorry Fairhurst
DISCUSS
ELP path validation
ELP Probing
*-22*
GORRY-3
Gorry Fairhurst
DISCUSS
Monitoring expectations
ELP Probing
*-22*
KETAN-1
Ketan Talaulikar
COMMENT
Probing integral
ELP Probing
*-22*
KETAN-2
Ketan Talaulikar
COMMENT
Probing reference status
ELP Probing
*-22*
KETAN-3
Ketan Talaulikar
COMMENT
Service chaining ambiguity
Service Chaining / Deployment Incentives
*-24*
KETAN-4
Ketan Talaulikar
COMMENT
Which traffic to services
Service Chaining
*-24*
KETAN-5
Ketan Talaulikar
COMMENT
Experimental track concern
Introduction
*-22*
KETAN-6
Ketan Talaulikar
COMMENT
LCAF maturity
Introduction
*-22*
KETAN-7
Ketan Talaulikar
COMMENT
Multicast refs missing
Multicast Considerations
*-22*
KETAN-8
Ketan Talaulikar
COMMENT
Multicast behavior
Multicast Considerations
*-22*
GENART-1
Peter Yee
GEN-ART
Abstract implies new encoding
Abstract
*-22*
GENART-2
Peter Yee
GEN-ART
Intro ordering
Introduction
*-22*
GENART-3
Peter Yee
GEN-ART
Acronyms expanded
Intro / Definitions
*-22*
GENART-4
Peter Yee
GEN-ART
Path stretch defined
Introduction
*-22*
GENART-5
Peter Yee
GEN-ART
ELP definition consistency
Definitions / Sec 5
*-22*
GENART-6
Peter Yee
GEN-ART
SHOULD/MAY usage
Definitions
*-22*
GENART-7
Peter Yee
GEN-ART
ELP retrieval failure
Section 5
*-22*
GENART-8
Peter Yee
GEN-ART
CoS terminology
Section 4.3
*-22*
GENART-9
Peter Yee
GEN-ART
Loop wording
Section 4.4
*-22*
GENART-10
Peter Yee
GEN-ART
Expired reference
References
*-22*
ERIC-1
Eric Vyncke
COMMENT
Security over-claim
Security Considerations
*-23*
ERIC-2
Eric Vyncke
COMMENT
Interception risk clarity
Security Considerations
*-23*
ADRIAN-1
Adrian Farrel
COMMENT
TE definition alignment
Introduction
*-22*
ADRIAN-2
Adrian Farrel
COMMENT
RFC 9522 reference
Introduction
*-22*
CHEN-1
Meiling Chen
COMMENT
Missing architecture figure
Architecture / Figures
*-22*
CHEN-2
Meiling Chen
COMMENT
Protocol scope unclear
Introduction / Architecture
*-22*
CHEN-3
Meiling Chen
COMMENT
Security risks analysis
Security Considerations
*-24*
IANA-1
IANA (David Dong)
IANA
Registry actions
IANA Considerations
*-22*
IANA-2
IANA (David Dong)
IANA
Retain IANA section
IANA Considerations
*-22*
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 4:52 PM
Subject: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.txt
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: <lisp@ietf.org>
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.txt is now available. It is a work item
of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) WG of the IETF.
Title: LISP Traffic Engineering
Authors: Dino Farinacci
Michael Kowal
Parantap Lahiri
Padma Pillay-Esnault
Name: draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.txt
Pages: 25
Dates: 2026-01-09
Abstract:
This document describes how Locator/Identifier Separation Protocol
(LISP) re-encapsulating tunnels can be used for Traffic Engineering
purposes. The mechanisms described in this document require no LISP
protocol changes and specify how existing Routing Locator encodings
are used to construct Explicit Locator Paths for traffic engineering
purposes. The Traffic Engineering features provided by these LISP
mechanisms can span intra-domain, inter-domain, or a combination of
both.
The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-te/
There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.html
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-lisp-te-24
Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-leave@ietf.org
- [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.txt internet-drafts
- [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.txt Padma Pillay-Esnault
- [lisp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.txt Padma Pillay-Esnault
- [lisp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.txt Ketan Talaulikar
- [lisp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.txt Padma Pillay-Esnault
- [lisp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.txt Dino Farinacci
- [lisp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.txt Ketan Talaulikar
- [lisp] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-te-24.txt Padma Pillay-Esnault