IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

"Vina Ermagan (vermagan)" <vermagan@cisco.com> Tue, 10 July 2018 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <vermagan@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012741310CD; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ewR_Yr3KvbRM; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA66113104C; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4589; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1531253143; x=1532462743; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=1sQyGtWgofSZUyijiPWcAeA/WXzNlY6OQBEyma29ZRI=; b=dlWTTHxgV0L2h8Ja0xlIDWmIm+6NJ8OpQ4Xp67EyKeZPq74SD1Wu+Bj0 elE2n6cqVU67+5coVeLtc4cvkFoRHGPEWzmQKi3wD5wd2iZAR7zkfWbpV ajqaeTTuim/iK+OJiMyXvoXfUZsBHEf0HXmm00K1IrYBvQEp08BxVzJ5B 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DIAABfEUVb/40NJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJTdmMPcCgKi3SMNoIKkCSFDhSBZgsjhEkCgiohNBgBAgEBAgEBAm0cDIU2AQEBAQMdXBACAQgECgMDAQIoBzIUCQgCBAENBYMhgRtkD6xChFuDc4EzBYh5gVc/hCGDGQEBA4EqAQ8CAgE+hTYCmVIJAoYHiR2BQ4QPhneBF4o4hzMCERMBgSQdOGFxcBU7gmmLFYU+b4w8gRoBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,335,1526342400"; d="scan'208,217";a="141496820"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jul 2018 20:05:25 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (xch-rcd-019.cisco.com [173.37.102.29]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w6AK5Pdn020381 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:05:25 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-019.cisco.com (173.37.102.29) by XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (173.37.102.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:05:24 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-019.cisco.com ([173.37.102.29]) by XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com ([173.37.102.29]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 15:05:24 -0500
From: "Vina Ermagan (vermagan)" <vermagan@cisco.com>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
CC: "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf
Thread-Index: AQHUFRF3jxpYNHSpbkagDzySVAYfkaSIxwcA
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:05:24 +0000
Message-ID: <D76A5E38.E8398%vermagan@cisco.com>
References: <264A0327-FBC2-4768-89DA-53BEE10AC6CF@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <264A0327-FBC2-4768-89DA-53BEE10AC6CF@gigix.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.7.1.161129
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.208.120]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D76A5E38E8398vermaganciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/1_jrU3RoIrPNPLVQRbYP2pPYVZk>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 20:05:47 -0000

I believe the document is ready for handing to the AD.

I am an author on this document.

Best,
Vina

From: lisp <lisp-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net<mailto:ggx@gigix.net>>
Date: Friday, July 6, 2018 at 3:06 AM
To: "lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org> list" <lisp@ietf.org<mailto:lisp@ietf.org>>
Cc: "lisp-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-chairs@ietf.org>" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:lisp-chairs@ietf.org>>
Subject: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

Folks,

As Alberto mentioned in a previous mail, in London there was consensus to move forward draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-02] (after the few fixes that I asked).

Fixes are done, hence, this email starts the usual two weeks WG Last Call, to end July 20th, 2018.

Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD.
If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.

Thanks

Luigi & Joel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email