Return-Path: X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9E1129C53 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:11:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lRdmzRu6UCfy for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:11:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pf0-x232.google.com (mail-pf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 204C3126C2F for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:11:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id c143so3830219pfb.6 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:11:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=7BGxRkyOQ3d0K4O66f6HYvnMK7la6dFLPTCKbRE8unk=; b=tdyDgnxA7Y/4yLdNN/QBx1Exn5BQyPnQdWmk7Q+kDkgbgD+w0S/PbfgBd7HtA0wVun rVNrAXwKlprgkKTPv7QibgbZAvYIkm4msnUX5gh6OtqlQiyC2hPYF6JVralHopvnDfCg LWX+4D83YLhXSr6mtEEcaGeYSZ8z+N4kQfXtQo6SYSUVXYFORjL7SYJdk1JvQGKjRM7z CE1z7uKS6PKe6GcQhVHRJoOJrDtpqp78cTLXpFCkPBETVIlutLdJNAFhFbvSgZfBg4J6 otMwnkkTdvt3xFp+VtLJxk9R6ut8J1NmIUOzPPoLkG1Aif6zGFxBI/lsrgiuuB2mPGRZ PAVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=7BGxRkyOQ3d0K4O66f6HYvnMK7la6dFLPTCKbRE8unk=; b=OOwVpMzX5FpAWJQbs6tWY9aExAngLJ6DDTBgJkdFSrW2aPN8ZTQhPS2CMiPGlwA+uN NNorfmXLeGYjaQAoEFSN1VGn3lt80M8sqOjTJaVtXIzpTIawJnw9DBsI7s2+kdZndNNm /T9tllWMmN/XeY51oyRlbh9PjzZvTEyFXCxJJjRJcWeME4h3h6DM6xOJ45LQJqwgPSvJ 0+fAYEnme2s+XV/A6ReMISJGqXdzOz1Rc1w1N6GPGMMziYkpXEHCMobhhDTI44VVmMtS bbshYRkYcgZBwA49VkIOKqv5L00GCo1sVzs5nYmYS13s8E8UyiyB0fC18pdpbBhR8EmS CrIg== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBZ/s1PjwMt3kuu1V8hslp5zXGHBkFAkS6ZK1Arp7eCzjZC9s1K MR/4G3xuPilAY+BWFsD7wl8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224x3zpN3v7dBFXFjD4xNm9vfc8fQlaUC+4MJ9vRhIokkAYcUNKmbrBNoxO3RSCZ7qmBmKj7gA== X-Received: by 10.99.140.85 with SMTP id q21mr2043836pgn.51.1519409492436; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:11:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.31.79.202] ([96.72.181.209]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o64sm6653426pfi.88.2018.02.23.10.11.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:11:31 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) From: Dino Farinacci In-Reply-To: <2a1f8a88-eed5-a433-9d53-ae9c8483bf6c@joelhalpern.com> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:11:31 -0800 Cc: Luigi Iannone , "lisp@ietf.org list" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9FA74C96-C079-42A5-B56C-B7718647CF5C@gmail.com> References: <2a1f8a88-eed5-a433-9d53-ae9c8483bf6c@joelhalpern.com> To: "Joel M. Halpern" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [lisp] RFC 8112 X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 18:11:35 -0000 I don=E2=80=99t understand why its different than lig. Can you put it in = the list? Dino > On Feb 23, 2018, at 9:55 AM, Joel M. Halpern = wrote: >=20 > It is not listed because it is not a working group product. It is an = Independent Stream document from the authors. (I agree it is a useful = document, but that is not whta that list is about.) >=20 > Yours, > Joel >=20 > On 2/23/18 12:34 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote: >> Chairs, can you check why RFC 8112 is not listed in the RFC list in = https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lisp/documents/? >> Thanks, >> Dino >> _______________________________________________ >> lisp mailing list >> lisp@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp