Re: [lisp] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: (with COMMENT)

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Thu, 18 February 2016 00:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849F31A0AC8 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:36:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WwSZk0fHaTGA for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:36:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DA811A1A36 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:36:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id g62so2992665wme.1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:36:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=KLIHmj1CqdtZne71VJfzQ1iIvYACY85S9PvVibnpeeg=; b=kLgfoZvv3fhEZk+cXzpMa6ZnU/jZVZ8c6q6CttUEcsdGYPY6pmj85dd097GmmtbxwA S3iAPuY6c1eLG9ax8zZmXPiP882j0N2qDu7UXYWbGl0cA/f7lphQ+sI6KonIEtUu57v7 zCKIOzu5qMrtCkXtLKITvSJHOtUgrX8mryoRggMxpXVlkkq+4qkqFG9J9EVo8KZOpSCk p+WVmAuDnEBcxhoiMDSM4bI3GYPZQXdarmRcmUC9sZNRRAnHY6wuCc/F6/nhF2gMjQHK s98SYabCGGJEDhH9OEE1RI8fH8wACLIOUilByFCQ3FGCVUtQpEjO+DziSK4DMpmNiRSn 6Gzg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=KLIHmj1CqdtZne71VJfzQ1iIvYACY85S9PvVibnpeeg=; b=KMIZioe+Xb2UKMJxnM+lxl3GJj9RFuaRXQ4DHZEoDJH0FMhAgV5rjlSFIYlX8gcuEy dSt0UrHfHY7iqa75koin37Kw1hzPg//hhWVFHkaooG9RSQX4cumh3e4NJLAXiKMoU3Mt x+Kd9a4WBGgpzyHBZm46dMNB8nYcesB6LUhZGJde/i7fkzWIhU22ChO4c62qvUoUfGZM XJpZ/czlJ+eFo0r7lspLM1g0Dep4VqgouMOvUFmSCxpEf7S+Eq1b7naJQLcPvR2sLzpK P6LuBma4GMwvfdUzR9Zb2rc+ufvxIQ11S60oSPugAbTYovZre0kY+VpsHtO/Mcm7/P+m MkxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORFKlLmomjtwL5EIB1iI/ECAp4Mdw8YhTTT+1p5smWyKczq3Ng5Fu/Hc0ER2uYO/Q==
X-Received: by 10.28.102.68 with SMTP id a65mr390082wmc.12.1455755777639; Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:36:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fatboy.intern (i577B59F2.versanet.de. [87.123.89.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gg7sm3937108wjd.10.2016.02.17.16.36.12 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Feb 2016 16:36:16 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <20160217210824.1236.47093.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:36:07 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EC802076-C30D-419F-8F28-F359B3B65EC3@gigix.net>
References: <20160217210824.1236.47093.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/4EyMYSpMJDYq0IYZPSr_YL7k-Ak>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 00:36:31 -0000

> On 17 Feb 2016, at 22:08, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-06: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I share Alvaro's thought that this should be experimental. (And if not
> that, then a BCP).
> 

Nothing against it….

> -4 (and others)
> The top level "MUST" follow these policies does not need the MUST. The
> policies have their own 2119 keywords. As written, it implies things like
> "MUST follow this SHOULD" which is a bit awkward.
> 

you mean that we only keep 2119 keywords in the policies but on the the very fist sentence of the section, am I right?

> 4, policy 2:
> I gather the point is not so much that the registrations need to be
> renewed as it is they need to expire if not renewed. That is, there's no
> SHOULD level requirement for a registrant to renew it's registration
> (maybe no longer needs the registration.)
> 
> 

You mean we put the first should as lower case (non 2119 keyword)

ciao

Luigi