Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]
Lori Jakab <lori@lispmob.org> Tue, 01 August 2017 09:27 UTC
Return-Path: <lori@lispmob.org>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98399132CB8; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 02:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R5NFT-EZ7j9D; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 02:27:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D64C131F23; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 02:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DVAAAdSYBZ/xbLJq1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBg1pkbSeODnOQdZYNghIhC4UbAoRYGAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRkBAQEDAQEbBg8BOwsQCw4KAgIfBAMCAicfEQYBEoovEK42giaLTgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgQuCHYUvK4J7iAaCYQWReIVuiA6HUI1HgR6FVIpglXcfOIEKMiEIKQhJhUyBUT02ii8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,305,1498521600"; d="scan'208";a="656484126"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Aug 2017 09:27:37 +0000
Received: from lojakab-mac.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-102-253.cisco.com [10.61.102.253]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v719Ra3P017242; Tue, 1 Aug 2017 09:27:37 GMT
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org
References: <12777128-3072-493F-AA8B-247C884599C1@gigix.net> <7AFC6BD1-5E44-4146-AF97-DF0EBE340B78@gigix.net>
From: Lori Jakab <lori@lispmob.org>
Organization: LISPmob
Message-ID: <843e822f-dc36-4a5d-9e11-387ab25a7c56@lispmob.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 12:27:36 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7AFC6BD1-5E44-4146-AF97-DF0EBE340B78@gigix.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/4rjIVUlFMcTELovBo9uNd87wKxs>
Subject: Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 09:27:44 -0000
Support. -Lori On 7/26/17 2:16 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote: > The call ends August 10th 2017 ! > > Luigi > >> On 26 Jul 2017, at 11:41, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net >> <mailto:ggx@gigix.net>> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> During the 99th IETF authors of the >> document draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt >> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00] >> asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on >> adoption. >> >> This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the >> meeting outcome. >> The call ends on August 3rd 2017. >> >> Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of >> approval or disapproval. >> >> Recall that: >> >> - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is >> expected to >> modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the >> content is solid. >> Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see >> changes to its content. >> >> - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state >> your reasons why, >> and explain what it would take to address your concerns. >> >> - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues >> and we can >> begin a dialog about how best to address them. >> >> >> >> Luigi and Joel > > > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > lisp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >
- [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LC… Luigi Iannone
- [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Sp… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Damien Saucez
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Vina Ermagan (vermagan)
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Alberto Rodriguez-Natal
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Fabio Maino
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Jordi Paillissé Vilanova
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole)
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Richard Li
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Florin Coras
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Lori Jakab
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Alberto Rodriguez-Natal