Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-iannone-6834bis-00.txt
Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com> Mon, 21 May 2018 05:13 UTC
Return-Path: <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6A4124E15 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 May 2018 22:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sgEvgRBXYq_3 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 May 2018 22:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com (mail-lf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAFB21201F8 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 May 2018 22:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id t22-v6so2803259lff.13 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 May 2018 22:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Xwz4AkoHnH4jJpTJ+YbS/PmE4LVHdhSNnEEvLL41Hhk=; b=kibHu3reptOsybbXC30ja1GtU9EWO+ReYjtLtk8v5uTjdDzICwFcBjjhUCznS3pgSN V8T1YsFDs2hMhe1Nzo6Koh5+X+/gYV/rh9EP1PfSv47xHlSdmEGUapeHkNay2tp1MbVc 1hhKXLv8oGLbYwsc+j9GFZoAaIbCRk5uBHUQe7dy0amGob5LLztvm3nn/T0xdgUBWYrK jrMSmIKuzG1FFCzsC4bR/FTIc5lE9NVY3RUBgSWYjaJZ0YVa08dpL55qV3QGQo5pVChj /9ysCQAzCG3TMeKkjwZHoyMD0hq/Fr8ZNo3xrLSbsm8vwUnD0X7MrXI37PNlR9fuex21 OLJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Xwz4AkoHnH4jJpTJ+YbS/PmE4LVHdhSNnEEvLL41Hhk=; b=sk09y03j4mOgWdUPhc7hFTLjijwJ4c4U57oCkgwRMMze7OQV4Nl1HTvwOpRbHlTt5U t0tI6rBbxE3ar4puGFtyZHjjrzkUb0c7kkPon7a5NEjYkYePpoP0+w//iiA9brvq59Xd 0dN6rSxe7oFYZ3GSg8Op52b/931HVVirkTY2ueaWsNJpbdENdLQZLx/3pVBSZUaQyEgZ A8PIPdrVuG/LX/ulr+7ZEa3l6MOH0hqHFncXiBE+tya5VAbA11G2YezmntYoT+LqB3XR Y9hnjfGrBrD4Zi0Zfx2v5mvhS0wdkKhFEpqEZshk8rbYxC9zM/P3hbqDUj82zdfgTTvj g/iw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwd7eo3rzX54RCzKi+b3YvNMIq+smp0lvfgerz7ruW24b27sSeIu Hvf+VUO67/lN9t+jSQmQJ75n9FA9x+NbR2+ttqZdcA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZp4/SFP1OCmRMKKXryKF4+4T9EXQbx/NxUnODFJTwnNc05FuM3cvGFPS/V6BQFHDxyYiCKtntxCebZDrFM4gG4=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9689:: with SMTP id q9-v6mr10711772lji.35.1526879632772; Sun, 20 May 2018 22:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <152683978087.2752.5378419126377849283@ietfa.amsl.com> <e59cebd4-df4b-28a0-85ad-13f68f65f013@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <e59cebd4-df4b-28a0-85ad-13f68f65f013@joelhalpern.com>
From: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <rodrigueznatal@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 22:13:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+YHcKE0pFHy0PtR0Rhetfkgo992j44RyO0=z4ZhEO4iTLaW1A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000205185056cb05e09"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/6BO7ubl5WK2CyX34wEfjm-y7kLY>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-iannone-6834bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 05:13:57 -0000
I went again through RFC6834 while I was reviewing RFC6830/33bis. I think it can be sent to the AD. Thanks, Alberto On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 11:18 AM Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > This starts a 4 week implicit adoption call and explicit last call for > the LISP Map Versioning draft revision with the purpose of moving this > work onto the standards track. > > Please read the draft. > And then speak up as to whether you agree or disagree with us sending > this document to our AD for IETF LC and IESG review as a Proposed > Standard RFC. > > We will allow 4 weeks for this call, ending on Sunday, June 17. > > Thank you, > Joel > > PS: I will try to find a way to mark this suitably in the data tracker, > but I suspect it does not have a state to reflect this. > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: I-D Action: draft-iannone-6834bis-00.txt > Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 11:09:40 -0700 > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > > Title : Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) > Map-Versioning > Authors : Luigi Iannone > Damien Saucez > Olivier Bonaventure > Filename : draft-iannone-6834bis-00.txt > Pages : 19 > Date : 2018-05-20 > > Abstract: > This document describes the LISP (Locator/ID Separation Protocol) > Map-Versioning mechanism, which provides in-packet information about > Endpoint ID to Routing Locator (EID-to-RLOC) mappings used to > encapsulate LISP data packets. The proposed approach is based on > associating a version number to EID-to-RLOC mappings and the > transport of such a version number in the LISP-specific header of > LISP-encapsulated packets. LISP Map-Versioning is particularly > useful to inform communicating Ingress Tunnel Routers (ITRs) and > Egress Tunnel Routers (ETRs) about modifications of the mappings used > to encapsulate packets. The mechanism is optional and transparent to > implementations not supporting this feature, since in the LISP- > specific header and in the Map Records, bits used for Map-Versioning > can be safely ignored by ITRs and ETRs that do not support or do not > want to use the mechanism. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iannone-6834bis/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iannone-6834bis-00 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-iannone-6834bis-00 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list > I-D-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > lisp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >
- [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-iannone-6834bis-00.… Joel Halpern
- Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-iannone-6834bis… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-iannone-6834bis… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-iannone-6834bis… Alberto Rodriguez-Natal
- Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-iannone-6834bis… Lori Jakab