IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Questions about draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-03

"Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com> Wed, 19 February 2014 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <darlewis@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C7E1A04D8 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:38:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.049
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dmurqKEE7xc0 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:38:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F161A03FF for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:38:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=807; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1392831498; x=1394041098; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=/5wZwQffaYL2kIbqLCvJHF4vDFV0QWG0hmM1V50WC8E=; b=dCeb1y7MHF+iCVeljZyHHACsCFxh28PfPafKhMw7bovWA5oG+9GbnXqe Np9dc1kcAY+/svkJR+dNp0PLMnPdLMgEj5J1FjvcFR37cISkHQPyqf3bE /k1rFHY8bKkFWmse3Or3zvqTv8/BfvZ66F+mhrhGC6PiaYdVDvmNk2/zj U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAMXrBFOtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABZgwaBD795gRkWdIIlAQEBAwF5EAIBCEYyJQIEDgWHfQjODReOMTMHgySBFAEDmDCSJIMtgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,507,1389744000"; d="scan'208";a="305152285"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2014 17:38:11 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com [173.36.12.80]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1JHcBnB025779 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:38:11 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.5.9]) by xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com ([173.36.12.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:38:10 -0600
From: "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com>
To: Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] Questions about draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-03
Thread-Index: AQHPLZgzXA4zb8V3RkCoLKxm7RuEBw==
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:38:10 +0000
Message-ID: <4DBDFE89-BB21-433A-9B96-58A4A93CA7E8@cisco.com>
References: <20140218144825842648.087ffc67@sniff.de> <5689A37C-B58A-4144-AB01-A61DFCE1B999@gmail.com> <A5E2D567-7C8D-4024-AE61-CFDA9400123A@inria.fr> <A948F13B-023B-43FB-92EC-D4DA6A832404@gmail.com> <D232D17D-49D4-484C-96AB-5C5D48291AF9@inria.fr> <561A89E6-B2AB-4EF3-8FFC-B87BEBF680E2@gmail.com> <B5B0430A-9CD8-40A1-AC20-5D98B1EACC0F@cisco.com> <2D848EE0-F117-4FF7-9DB3-C5DA742A8804@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <2D848EE0-F117-4FF7-9DB3-C5DA742A8804@inria.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, OOF, AutoReply
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.154.148.69]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <755CA88ACB75274D9B0DE32A2988CED1@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/6ULsXOnEk3omwh6vcOrSRAOI_KE
Cc: "cf(mailer list)" <cf@cisco.com>, Luigi Iannone <luigi.iannone@telecom-paristech.fr>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Questions about draft-saucez-lisp-itr-graceful-03
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 17:38:23 -0000

On Feb 19, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr> wrote:

>> I've always thought that the mapping system will have to have capacity to deal with broken clients, random LIG bots, and DoS attacks (just like, say, DNS does).  This leads me to believe that over-engineering the management of sending map-requests on a given ITR will likely end up creating more complexity, and therefor fragility, in the implementation.
>> 
> 
> That's a point we can discuss, but are you ready to accept packet loss?
> At the end, a miss = a packet drop…

"Screws fall out all the time, the world is an imperfect place." --John Bender

Seriously though, I'm perfectly willing to accept packet loss, but I recognize that there may well be people who won't. 

-Darrel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email