Re: [lisp] Call fo adoption of draft-boucadair-lisp-rfc8113bis-01.txt

Alvaro Retana <> Mon, 24 September 2018 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E2C130EE2; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n4gjBlDSXv3Z; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79E71130EC4; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id c18-v6so2940213otm.3; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uOlORzr6/HT0w69oB9EPaIpDxUSmG22fm9fwdmdo+2c=; b=LRiuTwwQbLSZBvtjMIvpsOCw0T5FeZuhP67BoN/qdRM17ibtK7Veb2ZcQctibma4IC ml3V0zBbCsmjwyMCxpM2BCfp3o/4pwu+qapExA+RDtquP+8P3cj+wZHge4u3tW0Qwq67 l1AcdRwto3/8ybf9xUskIm5bgW3YT/n68t77aZIBFY+QP0nrNZJQnBRGpw2x/EuYckWj F3Mp25XvDGiCv/lLW87VuvVnutZBWdCIUexqTagB5DSz0EvCS7eXWlReZ413SPvmxrwi APo4a2+Kkha5mtsdO7T0GhuYPfFSIpM6xfYvbfpsuHge67hx+7amvjT/IC0SoHBcYWmF 3Zxw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uOlORzr6/HT0w69oB9EPaIpDxUSmG22fm9fwdmdo+2c=; b=cp5BNkqibY0ISZKfUe6E6DTGVwWRhLJ/pYcbSSCvRD6wkYxF1I3K9ukz7tDnUBUUQa wX21E2fLVl+KQH195fM6q/BS0GrUHMMeeWViOBejM1t8Vmfu92fc/dkQ0LK5TyjZX1PW 5kNrHpRCA3zfQDAaqKRlhoaRmsz+h/s2YIQIdZD6/BiWuzt391swg5ZDVTTxMJuIgy/j //K7PrOntiGcwqo4/QyO9Kyz3zbybacTMxEAw6OVlP1jtrXBqJGnUcP3tYnCodtWbfYI mVJRKKDBBVPD/LjB/SBy8HZnbnnfkPtKlDpPZ7F27LYFDQPawZiBP/5b+yfBPgdpyHmS 8bTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogii1keP8/dZJshsdEBDJ9ugm1vpQapBjkUa75B3HlEyY8DEjEX NNlg7tye6wty07VJ6mFDnOBdDr+Nq88U4RNcgzxuow==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61S1D4u/D73HYNr6O+uoqLypF89So/0EvrzloClh9SpgPodBRmKFXNk2bBwzQBYHdzojvwzONtnEn8L2RjYlXM=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5f82:: with SMTP id g2-v6mr6640333oti.126.1537803035389; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by with HTTPREST; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:30:34 +0000
From: Alvaro Retana <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <>
X-Mailer: Airmail (506)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:30:34 +0000
Message-ID: <>
To: Luigi Iannone <>, " list" <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a8bf2505769fab28"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Call fo adoption of draft-boucadair-lisp-rfc8113bis-01.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:30:49 -0000

[Speaking as a WG participant.]


I don’t object to the adoption.

The main change with respect to rfc8113, that doesn’t seem right to me, is
that rfc8113 defined the LISP Packet Types registry, but this document only
adds to it.  In the weird world of Updating and Obsoleting RFCs, I think
this means that we’re left with no document being the originator of the

Note that rfc6833bis, which requests that the references from the registry
point to it *and* to rfc8113, also doesn’t define the registry (which is
the correct thing to do).

My 2c.


On September 19, 2018 at 11:05:05 AM, Luigi Iannone ( wrote:


here is another piece of the work done in our WG that needs to be moved to

It is the updated version of RFC 8113, nothing changed just updated
coherently with the current status of the other documents.

Because this documents is really really short we will have just one week
adoption call followed be one week WG Last Call.

This email officially starts the one week call for adoption.

Please spend 10 minutes having a look at the document and send an email on
whether you agree or not to adopt it.




Begin forwarded message:

*Subject:* *I-D Action: draft-boucadair-lisp-rfc8113bis-01.txt*
*Date:* 19 September 2018 at 16:49:31 CEST
*To:* <>

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts

       Title           : Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP): Shared
Extension Message & IANA Registry for Packet Type Allocations
       Authors         : Mohamed Boucadair
                         Christian Jacquenet
Filename        : draft-boucadair-lisp-rfc8113bis-01.txt
Pages           : 5
Date            : 2018-09-19

  This document specifies a Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)
  shared message type for defining future extensions and conducting
  experiments without consuming a LISP packet type codepoint for each

  This document obsoletes RFC 8113.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

There are also htmlized versions available at:

A diff from the previous version is available at:

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:

I-D-Announce mailing list
Internet-Draft directories:

lisp mailing list