[lisp] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-sec-26: (with COMMENT)

[Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lisp-sec-26: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-sec/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

# ART AD Review of draft-ietf-lisp-sec-26

cc @fpalombini

Thank you for the work on this document.

I only have a couple of very minor comments, easy to fix - feel free to take them or leave them.

Francesca

## Comments

### DTLS reference

Please add a reference to RFC 9147 on the first occurrence of DTLS in the text.

### + undefined

Section 6.5:
```
       *  per-msg-key = KDF( nonce + s + PSK[Key ID] )
```
It should be explicitly stated in the text what operations "+" denotes in this specification.

## Notes

This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the
[`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into
individual GitHub issues.

[ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md
[ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments