IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Confirm/Deny changes on draft 6830bis

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Mon, 29 January 2018 03:17 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1156913156A for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 19:17:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ItVQk7tsJxb3 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 19:17:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x231.google.com (mail-pf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACAEE13156C for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 19:17:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id k19so3710222pfj.5 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 19:17:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Cc5mAwlVCvV6+agPPf2e9v/K9bxtg1+iRuiVJYAAywY=; b=iJOdz8hfng3aX2jDSFatv7Jprxg6716IqeLS9vY/fUYCg1PAnYF5mzf5TthyooM9Ip nORt2L4Bat1D/DNepLMq85j749HALqlBx8habY9U0M7NgtaPEokYqn8wX9kDnuk18q+q VPTBXdTPy5Yqtolj+M6L0nYaj+qLFm8gYSGF1em+1xzYjCTS5o4w1z8VWoNI0rN9NXMC pNELbbVLinN1b6FaAPBtpgmPNbkdla/ZCiTO34jevd9WCe9AfRoLlW687/Z90hGc3sbj O1gElMs9ogEWNGTnfkODlyjc9MUKA+eEXCO0p5TE1/NamX5uEkhWwBqYT03enOIUtVrg Xmjw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Cc5mAwlVCvV6+agPPf2e9v/K9bxtg1+iRuiVJYAAywY=; b=ZUL9Hu3/G5wdTJK57Ri+ATEgm1iA9Afc5namDT6ahbMy0Nb9l+LlTGwyezunYsSMOi /XrkUTLyUuzOgz6B9xke0c+0xxK2e5qPRyL4hvPegqOjYCss1Rap2zEAX/3aIM43TqEX do5AifU7PATzj4lAy/IPpPr2FsI7VicOkNKyLx2KNENrVWE0ghWmd89tS48FTitcaJum QLO4X9119aXdi4JKfsBpxCgZ8R73XFEPNZD7bI8PnuSPe/jpwqh5C3s4xl0WiImajY4I ASG+mI60Es4xVwy9flc2zo9bUXZSFUX3ybGQgO54YyROQRh/pP0JtgwnlecBzla9RdCw VZFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdH1Z3TAVhub4XJ9dsVRFc7ZgZ+CZXecIpmV1rLk55ZhdiDob6G 1UX3xlj8yQSGTkm7vBSG6eDLevFM
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227GXAPUl2aX+lPBfJwMAWuScdORzy8b3/YQjQkp3JMqX3YwhN9SRZ/5133KesG6HH9Hyz8htA==
X-Received: by 10.98.228.5 with SMTP id r5mr26151488pfh.193.1517195861174; Sun, 28 Jan 2018 19:17:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2603:3024:151c:55f0:4564:f5d7:a123:b858? ([2603:3024:151c:55f0:4564:f5d7:a123:b858]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 8sm37329237pfh.170.2018.01.28.19.17.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 28 Jan 2018 19:17:40 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15D60)
In-Reply-To: <CAGE_QexRF4fKwLRsP5n6HQiQgM=HqFauuYn_=eT_mB8E42p2ow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 19:17:40 -0800
Cc: Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>, Albert Cabellos <acabello@ac.upc.edu>, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F6D13D9B-7B10-4FE3-A1F8-1EDCEACC4C96@gmail.com>
References: <CAGE_Qex--1pS5ivDmSZXVXLsFRgO+a9F32YmJL_dO7h4+4QMCA@mail.gmail.com> <EE6A9B4D-5852-40B6-A780-2FF6B574C62B@gmail.com> <E1C72747-5AB4-455A-A478-21771CE29A92@gigix.net> <545E1F14-2386-47CF-9337-E1FF1354CD03@gmail.com> <CAG-CQxp9kBOiOLvS4Wy93ezF5t4GQfqaurCj+aw+f=7Wjvc_uw@mail.gmail.com> <2893FDD0-35A6-4D41-90B6-3E794BEFE421@gmail.com> <CAGE_QexRF4fKwLRsP5n6HQiQgM=HqFauuYn_=eT_mB8E42p2ow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Albert Cabellos <albert.cabellos@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/7g55J1DljIM_Qu_U9kzZOLNlR-o>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Confirm/Deny changes on draft 6830bis
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 03:17:50 -0000

> On Jan 28, 2018, at 5:57 PM, Albert Cabellos <albert.cabellos@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> G.- Move sections 16 (Mobility Considerations), 17 (xTR Placement Considerations), 18 (Traceroute Consideration) to a new OAM document

For the record I don’t support this. It will slow down the process while the benefit won’t be worth the cost of an additional document IMO. 

Dino

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status