Re: [lisp] Draft-kouvelas-lisp-map-server-reliable-transport WG Adoption

Hi Dino,

Before I hit sent I did search the draft and did not find any match on QUIC
:(

But to your question - yes. I see no reason why LISP control plane could
not be running over QUIC.

Best,
R.

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 7:59 PM Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:

> The draft indicates QUIC can be used as a reliable transport. But are you
> saying QUIC should be used for all LISP messages?
>
> Dino
>
> > On Apr 22, 2022, at 6:35 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > May I ask for reasons not to use QUIC instead of home made UDP based
> transport followed by TCP ?
> >
> > Many thx,
> > Robert
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 9:42 AM Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > During the last LISP WG meeting in Vienna/Meetecho the authors of the
> draft:
> >
> > LISP Map Server Reliable Transport
> >
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kouvelas-lisp-map-server-reliable-transport/
> >
> > Asked for adoption as WG document.
> > Call for adoption during the meeting showed clear consensus.
> > This email is the usual procedure to confirm the consensus on the
> mailing list.
> >
> > If anybody has concerns about adopting this document please state so on
> the mailing list before May 5th 2022.
> > Please also argument the technical reason why you have concerns.
> >
> > Ciao
> >
> > Luigi & Joel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lisp mailing list
> > lisp@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
> > _______________________________________________
> > lisp mailing list
> > lisp@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>
>