Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]
Richard Li <renwei.li@huawei.com> Thu, 27 July 2017 16:35 UTC
Return-Path: <renwei.li@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0536E131F6A; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 09:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5O-R9gxldgY8; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 09:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5366713202E; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 09:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DSE11868; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:35:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:35:11 +0100
Received: from SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.240]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.153]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 09:35:09 -0700
From: Richard Li <renwei.li@huawei.com>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
CC: "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]
Thread-Index: AQHTBfNcKENHkpyIfU+PPTImkAUeN6Jn4K9Q
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:35:08 +0000
Message-ID: <F061CEB6876F904F8EA6D6B92877731C3B1D07C6@SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com>
References: <12777128-3072-493F-AA8B-247C884599C1@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <12777128-3072-493F-AA8B-247C884599C1@gigix.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.213.49.56]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F061CEB6876F904F8EA6D6B92877731C3B1D07C6SJCEML703CHMchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0205.597A1641.00FF, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.5.240, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 1614abfcef042c045ac8149060649fdb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/8hlpD2AnyIGw_nGPwBdp8ajN28Q>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:35:18 -0000
Support. Richard From: lisp [mailto:lisp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Luigi Iannone Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 2:41 AM To: LISP mailing list list Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org Subject: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt] Hi All, During the 99th IETF authors of the document draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00] asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on adoption. This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the meeting outcome. The call ends on August 3rd 2017. Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of approval or disapproval. Recall that: - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is expected to modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the content is solid. Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see changes to its content. - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns. - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues and we can begin a dialog about how best to address them. Luigi and Joel
- [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LC… Luigi Iannone
- [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Sp… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Damien Saucez
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Vina Ermagan (vermagan)
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Alberto Rodriguez-Natal
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Fabio Maino
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Jordi Paillissé Vilanova
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole)
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Richard Li
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Florin Coras
- Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendo… Lori Jakab
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specifi… Alberto Rodriguez-Natal