Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-10.txt
Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Mon, 05 March 2018 19:54 UTC
Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BAFF12E034 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 11:54:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mJLAHB1DNfhK for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 11:54:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 851CD12DB6F for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 11:54:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id w128so18412443wmw.0 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 11:54:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=0yERg+hpTIJwfqXZbdDwgENHcdSjEVY4Epq5vVXfFus=; b=Yo057mdmoIfGpAPscPuGeiHZ/3n2/Em8Idc+fDL3LWcgYp2yX1etSiN0UzLVofx0pW KGegp8pfO/qpPb8vf8Zpu125PpRebOrbyacyl3g5SzdpSw9J3pafU77PFHICMxgnRZKS 6y3JLsKMhihHi7D/w3/WBr3ecldShbOyfbARRtE4eQZ0Wguz4aI7TcM8pPPEE6kGQA7G e2dZbDm6ufu2waXpsbCJzrGlLztsvpunzKYmeJqjBnnoiSOCdDlf2oHAADtVDabPpRaZ bScchxqXYxGB4Bx52zBEWb30B/8rfnbvQ/jseWzVfpWq8KR4/+k3VZwhnuSEVyAtlM7J RwjA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=0yERg+hpTIJwfqXZbdDwgENHcdSjEVY4Epq5vVXfFus=; b=RXEFiNuMF1Z73txV5gK/Pn8MPsyjb6TprYQp7Ilu1s9URm6PtQbMrJcXacIV5HTcxZ KSMPCARNP+OKOet0/4I5AQcKDwphiA3gI2ri+7/tkpxHZxqLEHJeUA/hcTEhHRjnGvMn wORNjAn6DXaEHKfkxEqQYQjGTPc7R05qi6aDrkwadY6xHGVkspeS3dVFwf6RoXB7dlEj 4w422VSFfG5eBM/gHwvc0aZ0wXbPdBYUEB1krseR4ob4+7o4VFODAA0yKatt92oXPryn C5aPM/7KgsZfexRUxGJOIem8JcFPCsT7K1n+uGHspRxKq/wo++uXH80dTPCb+NrmseC8 b2WA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FeCqjT7GyBumHEBMHbvst5TnC+NXaPc+75QO2JquHLlUDMSt/D iEJkbxwK15/49yat2wbYRmzpvQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuQj3aki6QvTp4KcZCx1r/RTU2JDTzfEz0mcqROAaiw9omEs7zQs9R29N5BcLSyCcUGhN+LmQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.181.140 with SMTP id e134mr5587069wmf.56.1520279651686; Mon, 05 Mar 2018 11:54:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fatboy-2.home (2a01cb0404892000cdba2745cf67a5ed.ipv6.abo.wanadoo.fr. [2a01:cb04:489:2000:cdba:2745:cf67:a5ed]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l10sm11814480wrf.37.2018.03.05.11.54.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Mar 2018 11:54:09 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <96336BD1-113B-4943-9577-FE77F8815BBE@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 20:54:07 +0100
Cc: Albert Cabellos <albert.cabellos@gmail.com>, Albert Cabellos <acabello@ac.upc.edu>, "lisp@ietf.org list" <lisp@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1B8B0B8A-55D0-4256-9F3A-EC5221964108@gigix.net>
References: <152020746448.27984.11372193418686210665@ietfa.amsl.com> <B6FD836A-B8D0-4C65-BEDC-AE73F2A91F1B@gigix.net> <CAGE_QewcTZLP2dN_x7ijdkVpWVBUmTCq=EHUveGS1qFXUiw_Sw@mail.gmail.com> <96336BD1-113B-4943-9577-FE77F8815BBE@gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/ADwqeefs2lw-1oMgFTtyBOf2dAI>
Subject: Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-10.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 19:54:38 -0000
> On 5 Mar 2018, at 19:06, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> This document should address all the comments except this one: >> >> G.- Move sections 16 (Mobility Considerations), 17 (xTR Placement Considerations), 18 (Traceroute Consideration) to a new OAM document >> >> The authors would like to have a better understanding of where this text will go. > > Right, we concluded to not remove the valuable text. Nobody wants to lose valuable text. > A lot of time and thought went into writing it and we didn’t want to lose it. There was no where that was agreed upon to put it. That is not accurate. There was clear indication to move it to a new OAM document, without any change in the text. Purpose was to have just a different placeholder that make more sense. This is an half an hour task. > > So since we felt there was no concensus on Sections 16-18, we didn’t make any change. Again not accurate, please spend half an hour to create the OAM document. If you do not have time we can appoint other editors for the task. Authorship will be anyway preserved. Thanks Luigi > > Dino > >> >> If we adress this by today I can submit a new version (before the cut-off) taking this comment into account. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Albert >> >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote: >> Hi Albert, Dino, >> >> this version of the document doesn’t not yet completely respect the discussions of the last months. >> >> Do you plan another version before London? >> >> Thanks >> >> Luigi >> >> >>> On 5 Mar 2018, at 00:51, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >>> >>> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. >>> This draft is a work item of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol WG of the IETF. >>> >>> Title : The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) >>> Authors : Dino Farinacci >>> Vince Fuller >>> Dave Meyer >>> Darrel Lewis >>> Albert Cabellos >>> Filename : draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-10.txt >>> Pages : 50 >>> Date : 2018-03-04 >>> >>> Abstract: >>> This document describes the data-plane protocol for the Locator/ID >>> Separation Protocol (LISP). LISP defines two namespaces, End-point >>> Identifiers (EIDs) that identify end-hosts and Routing Locators >>> (RLOCs) that identify network attachment points. With this, LISP >>> effectively separates control from data, and allows routers to create >>> overlay networks. LISP-capable routers exchange encapsulated packets >>> according to EID-to-RLOC mappings stored in a local map-cache. >>> >>> LISP requires no change to either host protocol stacks or to underlay >>> routers and offers Traffic Engineering, multihoming and mobility, >>> among other features. >>> >>> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis/ >>> >>> There are also htmlized versions available at: >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-10 >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-10 >>> >>> A diff from the previous version is available at: >>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-10 >>> >>> >>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission >>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> I-D-Announce mailing list >>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce >>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html >>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lisp mailing list >> lisp@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >> >
- [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-10.… internet-drafts
- Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis… Albert Cabellos
- Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis… Albert Cabellos
- Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis… Albert Cabellos