Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-iannone-6834bis-00.txt

[Lori Jakab <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

I support this draft going to the AD.

Best regards,
-Lori

On 5/20/18 8:17 PM, Joel Halpern wrote:
> This starts a 4 week implicit adoption call and explicit last call for
> the LISP Map Versioning draft revision with the purpose of moving this
> work onto the standards track.
>
> Please read the draft.
> And then speak up as to whether you agree or disagree with us sending
> this document to our AD for IETF LC and IESG review as a Proposed
> Standard RFC.
>
> We will allow 4 weeks for this call, ending on Sunday, June 17.
>
> Thank you,
> Joel
>
> PS: I will try to find a way to mark this suitably in the data
> tracker, but I suspect it does not have a state to reflect this.
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-iannone-6834bis-00.txt
> Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 11:09:40 -0700
> From: [e-mail]
> Reply-To: [e-mail]
> To: [e-mail]
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>
>
>         Title           : Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)
> Map-Versioning
>         Authors         : Luigi Iannone
>                           Damien Saucez
>                           Olivier Bonaventure
>     Filename        : draft-iannone-6834bis-00.txt
>     Pages           : 19
>     Date            : 2018-05-20
>
> Abstract:
>    This document describes the LISP (Locator/ID Separation Protocol)
>    Map-Versioning mechanism, which provides in-packet information about
>    Endpoint ID to Routing Locator (EID-to-RLOC) mappings used to
>    encapsulate LISP data packets.  The proposed approach is based on
>    associating a version number to EID-to-RLOC mappings and the
>    transport of such a version number in the LISP-specific header of
>    LISP-encapsulated packets.  LISP Map-Versioning is particularly
>    useful to inform communicating Ingress Tunnel Routers (ITRs) and
>    Egress Tunnel Routers (ETRs) about modifications of the mappings used
>    to encapsulate packets.  The mechanism is optional and transparent to
>    implementations not supporting this feature, since in the LISP-
>    specific header and in the Map Records, bits used for Map-Versioning
>    can be safely ignored by ITRs and ETRs that do not support or do not
>    want to use the mechanism.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iannone-6834bis/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iannone-6834bis-00
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-iannone-6834bis-00
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp