[lisp] Brian Haberman's No Objection on charter-ietf-lisp-03-00: (with COMMENT)

"Brian Haberman" <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 03 February 2016 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101691ACE23; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:18:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Brian Haberman" <brian@innovationslab.net>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.13.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160203151848.2111.33680.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 07:18:48 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/BQDvKXJ8Alxa4xE2bkDgRSy4dUE>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
Subject: [lisp] Brian Haberman's No Objection on charter-ietf-lisp-03-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 15:18:48 -0000

Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-lisp-03-00: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lisp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Terry that priorities should be spelled out. This is
important given the number of potential new work items that keep popping
up on the LISP mailing list.